Show precinct court the only case filed in precinct court this th Is week was made against fred clark charged with committing an assault with a deadly weapon clark Is alleged to have attacked kenneth brierley Br lerley and clarence jackson with a broom handle and a razor at the hancock hallcock home 1002 empire avenue the night ot of march beckson received a deep cut on hla his right hand requiring several stitches brierley Br lerley besides receiving blows over the he head bead also received two severe slashes on the right leg the causes leading up to the altercation are unknown at this time dark clark regained his liberty yesterday when he supplied a bond ot of 00 required lequir ed by the coul t tile the attorneys for both state and defense will decide next monday on the date of trio trial wi the jury trial which was held last friday the at al which time jas mus s en was charged with possession and manufacture of liquor resulted in ac curtal by jury the charge against was the ute rowl t li of the discovery of the still by sheriff adamson and members of the rolce department the first part of march when the officers ilsc the still st raenid and mark M rk mace ki ace vier found la in charge of the operation the case against kilgore was disposed of two weeks ago when he paid a fine of 00 arid and contended at the time that he alone was responsible for the presence and operation of the still Rasmus sens defense was that ills his pro pre sence at the place was A as only in the capa I 1 city of a customer having gone there to purchase a flask of whiskey i i although the state presented the testimony of six witnesses at the time of the trial the jury apparently believed the story etory of the defendant as they returned a verdict of ac a few minutes after the cose case was submitted for their con alteration alde ration j the jury consisted of lawrence olsen george sykes R C carter and J welsh A very cry interesting feature entered into the case during the examination of the jury which disclosed the viewpoint held hed by the public regarding the enforcement of the eighteenth amendment the jury panel of twelve men each one emphatically declared they were not in tavor favor of prohibition in the existing foien t today day |