Show JUDGMENT RENDERED case of brandegee vs edward J settled in the case of henry crouse and edward aa co partners under anc firm name of grouse fc brandegee against edward J and adaline defendants and kilpat rick koch dry goods co smith wal lace shoe co and ecwin co intervenors a decision has been rendered by judge mccarthy the above entitled action was heard before judge W M mccarthy and was submitted to the court on may 7 1002 and judgment is awarded in favor of the defendants it is hereby ordered that the actions of the plaintiffs brandegee and the intervenors kilpatrick koch dry goods co SmithA Vallace co and salici uwin co is hereby dismissed upon its merits it is further ordered that recovery be made from the plaintiffs and intervenors their costs and disbursements in the findings of the court it states that said edward J when he was going to buy goods from alie plaintiffs furnished a fraudulent statement that on august 31 1893 instead of being worth the total net worth was not in excess of and on april 1 1894 instead of and he was owing at the time in excess of instead of throughout the findings the said edward J is scored by alie court for the methods used in conducting the business in the conclusions p f he law claims debts and judgments ot the plain tins and intervenors against the defendant edward J barred and discharged by virtue of the discharge in bankruptcy given march 15 1899 that the defendants are entitled to judgment dismissing the action of the plaintiffs and of jhc upon me merits and defendants entitled to recover their cots the attorneys attorn eye in the case were IL ll enderson and G F boreman for the plaintiffs C for the defendants fend ants and george L nye for the in ors |