| Show WILL FREE COINAGE ALONE A few days ago THE STANDARD pub an editorial under the above heading which was intended to faduce the logan journal to give its reasons for making the assertion that free coinage at 16 to 1 alone can bring prosperity the ogden xray X ray takes up the editorial and makee a two column criticism and by insinuation asks if the populists lists know too little for to dis cuss this question with a populist THE is ready te or any other question with populists lists as well as others provided fair and respectful language can be used in the last issue the xray X ray bad a sensible and clean article enuch eo that we at first thought it was impossible to emanate from the xray X ray editor the xray X ray makes a sound argument but ita entire article is in harmony with THE STANDARDS editorial to which it ie the X ry argues that the tree coinage of silver will put more money in circulation and that prosper ity will be the result of ani increased cir cu lation now it our populist editor will read editorial over again he will find the following the free coinage of silver will produce no more prosperity than will 1 l the same volume of increase in paper S money or any other lecal tender money from this the xray X ray editor will see it but endorses in toto TUB STANDARDS position TUK STANDARD in discussing the dilver question declines to make any defense of what the republican or democratic party or any other parly said in the past and in answering THE editorial the xray X ray will oblige by answering only such editorial standard is independent and declines to boost or be held responsible tor the actions of eicher party to bring this matter squarely before the people we will ask the xray X ray to answer this question not considering silver mining communities can the free of silver at 16 to 1 alone produce more prosperity than an increase of our circulating medium by the issuance of paper or other legal tender money let the xray X ray either produce proof on this matter or let it come oot fairly and squarely equa rely and eay that it agrees with tn this particular |
