Show FOURTH DISTRICT COURT the trial calendar set merrall got three months the district court room yesterday presented a much different appearance from front that of the past two weeks and when judge andorson anderson 0 opened p ened court at 10 but few persons 0 other I 1 I 1 er t than ban the tile regular attaches of the district were pro ent nearly tho the entire da day was consumed in fit settine setting the civil trial calenda for this term the list is not yet t complete but goes as far as I 1 N november ove niber lath and is as follows MONDAY OCTOBER oil central pacific ISaU road co vs andrew ct al E ligans stagers t It agers Kin kemball iball A 4 allison All lson 1301 central iacino pacific Kall road co vs peter Nelson ewans it 1 rogers ards t barton OCTOBER 23 18 if ill cwb herg optical corn company vs dalton I 1 nye A cannon smith A SIJ smith i th I 1 N tanner evans A il kobera 2351 23 51 F it alien allen vs wn pacific hallway hallwa wa company kvanda rogers llo gera smith A bath smith 11 PL L williams OCTOBER daniel E band mann vs v southern pacific com company any kimball A allison marshall A toyle 2811 2611 caleb parry A va vs J II 11 A company evans E vans A Il smith A smith 2053 fiill hamilton vs harboy 0 taylor ct t al J it white evans A rogers pacific investment company vs L II 11 mitchell ct al marshall Mar A itolle L R ll It hodes OCTOBER ati ogden sash A door manufacturing company va john peterson kimball A allison painter A murphy marv back vs a philip ford miller A P baah a sh II arvey A pah pash FRIDAY OCTOBER 2960 american publishing company vs the tile 0 01 K MB N ane company 0 0 dey kimball A allison All lson 2975 2075 american publishing company compan y vs 11 A heed reed et al C 0 day dey 11 II 11 lien I 1 on derson MONDAY OCTOBER 1612 bernard dunn vs newton farr W it white ayans A smith A smith ami I 1 lobert J hawthorne ve v philip purser IV W 11 II snelling Bnell ing boreman T c A boreman evans A 1 Ilo gera TUESDAY OCTOBER 30 13 brothers vs lr 11 M u bond miller leede A gunnell newton farr et al vs G 0 F halladay smith A smith kimball A allison allion on WED rADay OCTOBER john IL hammer vs va laih I 1 IH 11 parsons et al kimball A allison evans A rogers hueh kirkendall vs I 1 E if parsons et al kimball A allison evansa I 1 vans A ilog ers smith A smith OCTOBER 5 thomas B S woodland vs southern pacific company george J marsh marshall Mari hall A etoyle flobert ross vs boston brothers A johnson evans it clogere ll ogere dey A street E emma inn ia Ira hascall vs s IL I 1 il 11 I 1 parsons et al kimball A allison All laon leonard and macmillan V FRIDAY I 1 denver fish rish company vs 0 it 11 L 11 I 1 1 1 griffin Griff ln A II 11 heywood maloney perkins perk in a IV 11 II murray vs s A 11 II nelson etel etal millera A pash leisinger Lei aloar I 1 oar colburn birka A company vs Ys J E 31 conroy it hepherd e eherd shepherd evansa it egers rainier it yur phy M MONDAY ON D AY OCTOBER J foley vs union pacific raili rail i way company A J weber H carpenter 11 I 1 L williams 31 94 oliver C myers vs s union pacific railway company leans evans A rogers P L williams TUESDAY OCTOBER rose durfee et al vs Ys union pacific It railway ailway company maloney A perkins 1 P L williams illiams william garland vs wheeler bros N W V L maginnis george J marsh I arsh WEDNESDAY OCTOBER I 1 simuel samuel marte e icso vs ogden catyb t reet It railway ailway corn company pany maloney A parkins evans A rogers P T sanford et al vs it ir it slater ct et al smith A smith evans t rogers sarah woods et atals al ag southern pa ciale compan company evansa evans rogers marshall A I 1 royle 0 vly e FRIDAY OCTOBER astir am bonnett Bonnet tt A peck 11 II A L V co company mp an vw vs knowle knowles before besore A bedford ley c y k A street evans I 1 vans A rogers i NONDAY MO DAI october OCTOBER X 2330 1339 jarvis conklin mortgage age trust company vs 11 II ir if henderson etal etal r vans A rogers ogden e hiles niiles J N I 1 kimball 1 2 ogden clay company vs W if 11 I 1 harvey et al ogden hiles smith nith 1 smith J S painter abraham J kistler va s union aft railway com company papy J 12 E bagley 1 P L williams 0 1 I 1 TUESDAY NOVEMBER 12 I 1 3 N nettie ettie vs first national Nation liV bank 0 of ogden 11 II 11 II henderson I 1 evans A roger rogers lee curtis vs A IV wertz IV L maginnis smith 1 WED WEDNESDAY IV V it 11 booth jr arts va bear lale ke A river water works A irrigation company 0 J marsh evans Ito rogora W if booth jr vs bear fers lake ake A river water works A irrigation company 0 J marsh 11 jr II carpenter pr lyons A rogers 11 1 1 I 1 I 1 3rd ard I 1 Cuda liay packing company company vs i M T IIa Ila et al A rogers kimball balat A allisen allison fred lamer turner vs ir 11 W 11 shurtliff evans A A it j 1 FRIDAY SS 0 D kay assignee a 11 II jemmett eta bial B al jones J M coombs Eni Ei nanual anual Swi Swin noart eart vs 8 union pacific Rai lisay y company evans A R rogers 1 P I 1 L 1 aia williams aliani calvin 0 wilson vs wm win hall and J fowers AR A R heywood evans rogers william driver dm er et al vs s thomasj omasU Th et al kimball A allison W 1 I L sla maginnis ginnis THURSDAY INOVE NOVEMBER NIBER I 1 P 11 II aured allred ot al vs B salt lake tak Is city evans A rogers E JL D hoge i 3 mary lary M s1 sa dibble administratrix vs union pacific rail railway way company evans A rogers P L williams the days record GOT MONTHS in the caso case ortho of the vs s merrill ier judgment was rendered giving the boy three months in the he cache county jail jall I 1 WILL HAVE EARLY TRIALS in the tile case of th the people vs alexander I 1 robinson and wi william li irlin robinson indictment malicious mischief a tho the defendants pleaded I 1 ded not guilty and trial was set for V october t ber ath OLSEN C F olsen was arraigned on an indi indictment ct charging him wit with it embezzlement and entered a plea of not guilty his is bonds were fixed at and trial was set for october oth I 1 depositions TORE TO BE in the case cac of bernard dann vs newton farr on motion of ofa W it white order hl allowing depositions to be opened and published ONE MORE MISFIT mary E sheen brought suit against win sheen for divorce on founds the grounds of failure to provide and cruel an and inhuman treatment etc the judgment t that fiat the kii bonds of matrimony be solved and that alio fie be awarded the care and custody of a m minor inor child that pending this action n she be allowed tor for attorneys fee 75 for costs ami and 25 as temporary support and arid alimony that the defendant bo be restrained from front disposing of his property and that at the hearing tho trio court make such order in fix relation to the property and the tile maintenance a 0 of f the wife as may ma be just and equitable otho tho plaint lills attorney is J M coombs |