Show ww I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 WJ I 1 J I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 ITEMS FROM SALT UKE 1 I 1 I 1 ri i I 1 important land cast still 1 in I 1 I 1 f progress r 11 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 the coal COA I 1 famile at an sa ishop fla millva of r kill creek fur for dav I 1 asi chhabi oni to ober thi IN law I 1 I 1 1 T I 1 I 1 1 SALT LAKE nov ath I 1 1890 fourth west street ia is being buri anti faced by the utah central railway the coal famine is now according I 1 to th the statements of the coal merchants chan 8 virtually at an end the land contest case is ia bowlin progress seven days hare have been consumed cone umed and in that time only two gwo have been examined and the proba bill y Is that the in inquiry may go on for a konnight lon for night inight or more the time toda to today da y was 1 mostly taken u up p by professor profess or mar marcus c us jones who is the second witness interesting interesting facca are developing and the attorneys on both bides ei desaro are using every effort to win win shortly after 2 to dia dayan ln the third district court bishop james H hamilton amilton of mill creek appeared I 1 to receive sentence be ho having been convicted of unlawful cohabitation in response to qu questions by judae judge zane toe the defendant stated that it was bis his intention in to obet the la in relation to polygamy and unlawful citation considering that it was wail his big I 1 duty to do I 1 so in consequence of the I 1 position recently taken ty the church to which he be belonged I 1 I 1 TUB tue judge jauge toe district attorney it if be he bad anything to say on the subject act mr varian varlin replied to 0 the effect ob r act that if the court believed the defendant was sincere in bis his promises it out to be len lenient lent td him mr moyle in behalf of the defend ant directed the attention of the me court to the fact that we teiS given at the trial showed evidence of sincerity the bale bulk of it indicated that the defendant bad had not visited bis his plural wife but that had against defendants wishes visited his legal wife in a friendly or sociable way no special acts gets of cohabitation were shown in bis his conduct judge zane said be he was wai inclined to accept the statements statement ef of the defendant Z as genuine and as the object of I 1 the law was to reform and dot to inflict buffering ering he would fm impose poses a aln fine of and costs judge zano expressed s all the opinion that this course pul would d better the public in interest than sending tho 4 defendant to cample I 1 pr prison ison the lat lattera example ample he be I 1 thought would have B aBa lutary effect the fine and costs weta and defendant was di discharged ca 1 I 1 I 1 |