Show A tribune lie refuted EDITOR or OF taic STANDARD STANDA the salt lake lakein tribune in ita its issue of saturday the dinst publishes what claims to be a correspondence from american fork signed aim alma chipman in to the effect that on wednesday the ath of january WO 1190 I 1 married a second wife giving her tier name ae as anne bart at the manti land temple kever never before have I 1 attempted to answer the tribunal malicious attacks lie beeped ert U me ever sirce I 1 cams come t to 0 utah a ili fo tor r I 1 abw always ays looked upon that sheet as asa a disgrace toj urna liqua and to a community which permits such a slanderous paper to exist in its midst but inasmuch as the above statement mentions names place and kives gives certain dates I 1 feel aa as though it ought to be stamped broadcast as a lie from beginning V to end in connection with the lying statement of the tribune I 1 W ahl ill say ast birst I 1 have not been to manti tince since alay 1888 at the dedication of the temple second 1 I have not left american fork since the ot of december lw 1889 third 1 I know no lady by the name of anoe bart nor is sucha such a name known hereabout fourth there Is to no such man living I 1 ng in american Amp rican fork as alma alms chipman 11 nor has there ever been if these ebie facts speak for themselves and there is in no need for me to add to that the tribune rr ln lied lies an and will lie very re respectfully da IR en ED ISAACSON AuR RICAN fork ferk jan 19 1890 |