Show THE BA SS L I 1 J 10 it q fase t J gr U 9 tj s I 1 in 11 I 1 I 1 afi ur I 1 R ul CA abut mra mrs dt tiby I 1 0 1 I r vil i 1 1 3 01 ij 14 j 4 e 1 9 V i 1 T s AN AW OF THE D 7 aj V 11 2 i ii kate ili I 1 10 I 1 evidencia thab sa ext ex rt i H T CJ I 1 I 1 zin I 1 I 1 tu i 87 i 4 I 1 ito 51 I 1 11 pa 1 P 4 lad V 6 n 1 0 c kit a mo g A 4 K V ra resumed umed I 1 an ra i 0 talfe ti I 1 he r 11 husband the thi jmj tl bat t I 1 it was for ford ala the rife wife to testify tet liy Against her husband under tofiq the vr cir C lances of the present caie ar mrs 81 aass bassetti t I 1 ahn fit n to look thed egand I 1 ad U answer to the question pro p ra io und R prosecution yesterday sad r i 11 d ay a a I 1 bad st conversation conver tation ration with him defendant th A ahe H e told ine i e that le ile had tad be enao gaa and 80 at mtr aried I 1 j t 11 mr dickson gon when was the next il ft wae on the follow ins nit friday W hat diche p y that be ie ils thought done wong byi uy marrying kate kitti mitu what dee did bobay he lay he lie eaid that be he support pie and my f chimpen and 0 io 1 w rue did lia he ile jet I 1 ib V 10 j IQ I 1 be he bad had jdeen marij f ue did ad I 1 not tut ell tell nie sale ut ahat time lalit he lie tad me on a sub oCt aaion that ha lie married he lie was in lian L ian lie did not on hat day no air air i did you afterward receive a I 1 aura mons monar ora a divorce yea air ir where in sal 1 laky lake city I 1 what couler bation did you hav wll him then I 1 told him that I 1 would dt feud it and tell all that I 1 his marriage I 1 told mr babett be he would nut not rue that I 1 would give him hamright right ht away if he lie attempted a ibl Is divorce he lie said that rather than I 1 should appear against him and give him away and ad if I 1 would give glye him time he withdraw nith ith draw the suit on the thursday Jollo winf I 1 had a conversation witti with him and he lie asked sue if it 1 would help him out of odthe the s chope that be he had not got himself into I 1 t told d him that him here the witnel broke down and stud gave way to tears bhe she cuntin contin aad I 1 told him ithe would support rue joeand anduly my children uld not pot bother him lie oad said that he would Ye esir IC did Y g DM u aik aak him what he meant by bl it 1 I I 1 eak I 1 I 1 r I 1 he he aught lie hyll h sid done tine taa 1 I and hd ay eu would neat I 1 awant and I 1 raould liase myself albut living icv hills april D I 1 I 1 0 IT a r q v va J 4 k to you about i smalls dunlay y 3 ou oil ibave a ve benji mentioned boned nut before thil bil Sunda t yuo ino air tir f 8 fie he told yuli then that be was married yes hir mr I 1 ile uever asked consent no mr air he neier neer did I 1 i I 1 mick Y you yu u stated ve veeter sterl 1 4 I 1 that yo ka w IC te 6 bm ih I 1 knew her tier by rv you knew her herer pre pr loua louts to her tier mar at nag etor ua misfit UiS A fit it mie ille called at in may 14 i cn crich examined by air she sheek W you are a member of tile clural cl yes ag yg or how y you re been 1 l no I 1 WHA WAS born burn in ili this church 4 were yu Y u b burn n this country nn IN a ir 1 1 was buro burn in ili wales you kne abial polygamy 0 waa was I 1 an ali article or the be faith 0 ot I 1 the op church when you cime here no airl didiot did not arf when 01 did you anft inthe Ts es pamer of 1872 t 4 INK P aph yon never heard beard him defendant lefenda nt balkit talk it k how do know wb whether ether bc e was as opp ed to it not lail tau about it 4 jf 0 AL ai 1 1 I ill you eaid said yon never had talked about it jou talked about it frequently dal did yut you noi not 1 I dont know w did yon you eive give him to understand that you would n t live with him if he lie went into poly itam lie knew that I 1 aou would I 1 d nut not eife with that wt poly gauly how often olaf o did vid he lie and you talk to geilker gettier on this 7 objected to by ilia prosecution cution objection au detained mr sheeks did you often talk about ablaut it between ua I 1 decline Vs anier aniber er or I 1 court it is proper for you to anaker the tion it is necessary sary that these should be made hey are pot not for ahe purpose isyou ing you vl you hould anew er accord luk lust tu to the bt recollections did you inform him that not allow it I 1 diml dont know i did yon you ever talk to about it ye ao lair lr I 1 how frequently dont know bow evsi swathe the a him atio known t a altAl fl lahat hal tie he waa wits P boing poing to marry another wife chenever he never named marrying another woman until he h e told me abst be he bad married warriet one that he would mal marry one did you N ir at arthu tile lim P kate smith visited you did slid you know of any necy between t t en the and her no i air ir 1 1 JJ r J 4 did you enow abw I 1 si Tie 01 itin lier or her alto bin ony oo 00 any no sir how ilow did you learn that iw R maj married he lie told roe isae that widle he was in 10 lugs he married lien he lie was wa there it was on aap the air of P t el jt 1 when whet daphe nezi oan ersi tlora it wae was on tile folio inc iiii fahy ni ht I 1 lie a told me that he thought he had done rong arong in kate smith he lie sald aid he 49 would da d mi me 11 II my childrs n J was iya 11 vinall th t all iw about artie M roark 14 rl ag e to A pau panne and witness wito efti made no an ewer AI r ithe if he aid said mae whal vias a it afier auiler au nu iler oder A long tsuie witness faid fald I 1 du pot pa it 4 1 ajr mr sheeks what iran mastt about it wr wasp abol it thie oi o i about an hour when wax lb alie n next ext conver aaion ret fattini it jt it was in ISM 1885 t I 1 did didat yau uha live with mr babet 1 n lie mean t t mu Q pit i 1 j rr u u t 1 I I 1 I 1 yon you refused to live withelm up I 1 theotime the time you on received the di ili r i grrce ace I 1 esal ee air r 0 i I 1 inthe in ahe redirect ex examination attain atlon barreit Ban Bai reit pett mid said that she alx of thomire wh omire are dead the witness wu was then mr eta wl ins moved that the I 1 many be bd et stricken ricken oat out on the abat no corroborative evidence bed had been adduced adduced to ehoff that ii crime had laid been committed another protracted argument enan ed and at ite ita close the ourt ayer 0 ru le d th q 1 4 efort ae As taken 11 1 at two p m mm mr busett was ier ra railed aled baethe prosecution and eald then bt deforas ryen 1 ipg referred to defendant eun 1 I 1 A r Is lethal thil ill iii the braf yai you i g tbt J bad been sar yes I 1 anal you and SIr barsett athe aime awe yau you mentioned after sir ir basiel got ot a di divorce varce did you dimcho ib e fact had marred married Kaie mitti I 1 never pent any word lu its I 1 he offic ers 0 the clr lyuta lyu jut tl I 1 told w everybody else liae rei recited sted the de dew dei i fene opened alp ilp dij case with lib a statement to the jury byJ 4 rawlins bo ho mea et forth what vae was expected to be proven among a other thi thence bs it wit wa stated bat no no polygamous ou marriage took place as a charged chiai bcd in thin this indictment i but that defend defendant int married mar avate te rui thin in the month of Jassu arri Slung after he bad had been divorced from his hi first wife I 1 I 1 the divorce waa win then ofie redi evidence I 1 mrs hirs kate bassett took the stand I 1 and testified that ebb wair carried led deafen ant on the of january 1888 1880 yap never nover married ta ahe defendant on a former occasion she bb waa was burn in logan city and was enz enraged aged ae a clerk in the coop co op years witness lale on the of jabury 1886 durin 9 an goar oisa elie site was wa working in the coop tore during ibo the entire month mouth she slid went tu the store tore in the morning between evea seven and ediht t and remained akere tilli till eight ight in the bv essing she lived at home eliere were five fil living li vine together iii catrie in the day book during thera the month sooth august 1 ahe he day hook book was produced and the ent tit made by the witness were checked by her while upon the witness stand Cou nEtI rapel for detente defense when did yon you cameto bait salt luke lake ca city it was october in 1884 I 1 wei ow p an Y with t choir josept with it h one of my alaers while 1 ivas wa there I 1 never mr busett buton but on one a wall wa at the thi tithing officer I 1 then shook hand hands with him I 1 wad wa in ig company with ji number of other persona and tey ciez waxe present at the lime in a how long ion have y V you known mr bassett ila sieh 1 I have had a acquaintance with him for about about nine epars how ions long bad had you 0 u ly acquainted wit with il m him an previous to yur jour marriage about IS 18 month months cant yon ten when your husband c commented paying hie his addressee addresses to y oua it 11 was w M in i n october 1885 in reply to further questions witness said abio he did not know when mr ft a appael app p p lel for divorce S abe be his his of ri hp helot tot bia hia divorce frum from blit bl fl 91 ot wife 1 ws go ifie to iet ket a devoice from his first wife because she would not marry him unless he as divorced I 1 the cae case was wu still in progress at sit a flate ate hour I 1 |