Show EW QUESTION I 1 e etta who thought there 0 0 de to be redin rai e lection with the pr prosecution th utah under the edmund edmunds law is hot A ar 1 gamy icci aioo bt tbt since i something tom ething new it will be kemem v KA fredk tat in unlawful uD lawful andly gamy y a oen enderson bt hw duld yuld that the fire firs and legal irgal wife could not be compelled comp elfed tp ishu fira first wife 4 ir wife was waa arld iced atie aya excused if ao 10 ra sarah abo laima aims to tp be thebie the drife of tbt be W I 1 willingto testify buther but her 1 f to yi her ter j giving 4 a v ing ea evidence ence the question was argued by counsel yesterday aad and this the curt ruled foci ibe the purposes pur poste of the cae case lh atthe lady indy fiord fy A alexi X b by 5 and sud undoubtedly the matte wa GO before n higher courno coUr fo rev revida J is 13 a question otga obrea 4 jq acre f aid proceeding ala atit it fill billbo ill bo 40 watched car carefully dully |