Show ul R anih inird t jr mi 4 tta an r TC u purry came into the iret kulil by ber kroah JN kimball atler tb teeing eing 1 her abal thebie fsr sea tence in her case hia parry bad of the conditions laid ke in dafin rya oate r elif tUia the coart chati there was one by the baw mid thai frel auld eyer again belled att tn the bosl in lc cas to and these mr parry a thanking the court room i IT f i cabe of C B W B hodgis was called rand audr men for plaintiff by default the amount involved ie 25 froia 1884 kf totoa tc toA e was considered defendant wa 1 6 aby he ant jan alami v win jobson a damages fur deaul t yael fiet aalde with the that it should come up for fi ratay of next arm of courte sitab tsa malan vs thomas granger gt anger to ws argued byl it rogers for the appellant appel laut and HII for ibe respondent taken under ad jo abe case G child TS alien a motion fora new trial was taken u ader advisement i A ia recess was taken 1 mis m i s |