Show 0 P ARNOLDS ARNOLDIS CASE the Te testimony stimon for the prosecution ti on yesterday morning the case of 0 i P ar arnold nold was reached in the third district court but went over till the afternoon mr bickson stating stilting that one of his witnesses bad had not yet arrived the salt lake herald no did says the coq cl ae attracts considerable attention owin irto the fact that mr arnold had been before indicted for living with the same two ladies ladles named la in the present indictment having plead guilty having haying promised to obey the law as it was at that stage con trued by the court and having es c imprison menton that promise his indictment re caused no little surprise eur prise though it will bo be remembered that the th general public expression nattlie at the time wag was that bad had mr arnolds namo name not appeared so prominently in connect connection boll with that of 0 eo Q cannon at the time of hia his famous arret arrest he would never have been disturbed by the prosecutor A jury waa was and the indictment which charged that defendant had since april 1885 unlawfully fully cohabited with more than one woman as hia his wives waa was then read the indictment contains three counts mr dickson asked that all witnesses in ili the case for both eldes sides be excluded from the court room if the defense would kind enough to indicate who their witnesses were mr cawlina we may not have any we tant cant tell until you get through the judge let there them all be excused mr dickson then called orson ar ars nold jr he said am a son of the defendant my mother lives in the thirteenth ward have bave not lived at home during the period named in the indictment I 1 visit mother abo about otonce once a week have been father at matheas mSt math bere ets house during meal weal times father ila has been away irom from home some of the lime time since may 1885 1883 he was away from home two tuo or three months 1 I t think hink know fannie linuell linnell arnold I 1 she lie lives on first west street strett this city c ity she has bas lived there lor for six or seven years have been at her house several times during tho the time since tho the month of may 1885 1 I have seen her every time thue I 1 went there she has four ca children bil the eldest ia Is about ten year years old I 1 should judge the other three the youngest youn geet is about aboul three years old it is a boy I 1 think I 1 have never heard it called by name have seen my father at fanniea fannies house since the let of may 1885 two or three times we tave lave passed there several times in a baegy when he lie would cal rall in and I 1 would wait for him until ho tie came out I 1 never left him there nor called for him I 1 do not think I 1 would have forgotten it if I 1 had done so either elther batore or 1 ie l axia hesitation a about bolit a month ago the laet time I 1 saw him there was when I 1 left him ina buggy I 1 wailed for him bitu to come out as we went there to cether gether he waa was absent about five ini minutes when ho lie returned I 1 baye have been th there ere with him three or four times during the past acar year t tw ice in the past two month I 1 am merely z at now I 1 dont remember having seen him there nince since the first of january ind and the bilth of may this year M fr r dickson well 1 ill 11 see if I 1 cant refresh your memory reach ine for bis his grand jury notes mr sheeks we object to any re freshing any using of such notes which are the most unreliable of anything that co could uld be offered mr dickson dickso n the gentleman sent leman has no right to qu question estion these notes or that the clerk of the grand jury had made a laiso false eniry entry M mr r dickson was allowed to read froni frou his nole noles when he asked did you not eay EZY in tile I 1 crand jury room in reference to your father that you had seen him at the house within the first two or three months of this year witness I 1 dont think I 1 made any such a statement to clr jr W chenever father called on fannie ho did not tell rn me a whit what he went for he be never said anything t to 0 MON m I 1 suppose he lie beut there to see the child children ren there has been but little or no association bo be tween the two fatu illes the other witnesses examined for the were fannie D ar af nold alicia arnold 1 E eliza niza Gard john tyler thomas Th otna F smith and R A franks at the cloeo close of the examination of the above witnesses a continuation till this moru morkill mor ill was taken |