OCR Text |
Show Iihj UU DECISION AFFECTS OGDEN CONCERNS Decision handed down by the supreme su-preme court of Utah yesterday holds (hat contracts between the I'tah Pow r Ac l.ighi company and manj Utah firms, including Ogden corporations, in- discriminatory and should 'be mod iiinl The cases are similar to that of the United States Smelting & Re lining company against the power company and the public utilities commission com-mission which was decided last week a gainst the smelting compans The plalnlilf companies endeasored to hold the power company to con tracts after the public utilities com mission had held they should be modi -fled The cases decided yesterday were similar and were similarly treated as Lns one Friday. Plaintiffs in ihe cases 'iT.ided yesterday are: United States Fuel company, the Utah Copper company, com-pany, Union Portland Cement company. com-pany. Oregon Short Line Railroad company. Bamberger Electric railroad. Silver King Coalition company. Utah Metal & Tunnel company, Salt Lake Terminal company, Deseret News, ! Standard Coal company, Ogden Port-jland Port-jland Cement company. Utah Idaho Central railroad, I'tah Steel corpora" i lion, Judge Mining iz Smelting com jpany, Salr Lake g. Ctah Railroad com-lpan.. com-lpan.. Ctsh HniM cr,mpRn ami Sell I Lake City. Arguments in thiee other cases ' were heard by the supreme court yea-iterda. yea-iterda. These were the case of the i Home Brewing company against the American Chemical & Ozokerite com pany. on appeal from the Third dis trlct court ; the case of A. D. Van Wag onen against J. W. Whitmore, administrator, admin-istrator, on appeal from the Seventh district court, and he case of Solomon C. Stephens against Luella Doxey, on j appeal from the Second dlstriC) court. , Vll these thrc cas v. fi taken un-'der un-'der adiFement |