Show A SLIGHT inconsistency tn the caio ol 01 shepherd vs the second district court of utah judge of that district decided 08 ono of of the supreme court that in hi latter capacity he could not consent to the issuance of a writ of lacau o tribunal had no original jurisdiction in equity cases ilia ruling at that time was favorable to A prominent liberal of beaver county me carry by name he BOW decides that the supreme court has uch power because that tribunal decided that it could issue a writ of an criminal proceeding I f hi h not ehst gamblers would rail hedging what ia i UL honor goes to tho powers of the lu protect u lake refuge baund a mere technical dodging point lo 10 hio party the mention now ia are there are any axed legal landmarks by which lavry era may bo guided when tuch aie alou partisans part isana w loreman fit in judg OB ano WA |