Ogden Standard-Examiner | 1927-01-16 | Page 17 | Farm Relief Bill Assailed

FARM RELIEF BilL ASSAILED Curtis Crisp Act Termed Price fixing ly by Iowan WASHINGTON Jan 15 By IS-By ByThe The Associated AS The The Cur Crisp Cur Cur- Crisp farm relief relie r bill one of the measures brought forward aaa as asa a substitute for tor the McNary McNary- McNary Haugen measure underwent a scorching scorching- attack today from Rep Rep- Representative Representative Dickinson Republican Iowa lie He characterized the Crisp Crisp measure as price fixing as being a subsidy and as put put- put ling Ins the government definitely Into i WOULD DELAY Y The speech of the Iowa was made shortly after Tilson the Republican Republican lican bean leader iad 1 declared he be did ot rot favor consideration of ot farm relief on the floor until after aCter the disposition of ot appropriations bills bUls Those who say aay the tho 1 McNary- McNary McNary Haugen bill provides pro a subsidy DickInson said eald have ha not been foil following owing the trend of farm relief Those rhose who say It puts the govern govern- government government ment mont In business had better look 1001 carefully Into the Crisp bill bUl in 10 Iw of ot tb the fart tart that It Is sure to b bo offered as a substitute in inthis inthis inthis this house He le declared the farm depression was spreading and cited a a resolution resolution resolution tion framed today by Ohio mem meni- members members bers hers In congress that they stood unanImously for farm relief be be cause the trouble has entered that state otate DEFENDS DErE DS FEE rEC The rho equalization fee on agri agri- agricultural agricultural cultural commodities In the Mc- Mc Haugen Nary bill bUl to control crop surpluses was wu vigorously defend defend- defended defended ed ad Dickinson characterizing It asa s 8 sa a a provision for honorable repay repay- repayment ment meat of o 0 a a debt to the govern SOvern- government government ment J I IThe I The only pro Slon a loss Ion ot of the loan In the Crisp bill ho argued Is that tt it shall be assumed by the tho govern govern- meat and nd still sUIl some lomo ot of who who toted for that bill in committee voted against the Haugen bill lil last lut spring on tha tM ground found that It was wal wala wasa wasa a a subsidy Dickinson concluded with challenge to New England that If It wished to retain Its tariff It must ba be sympathetic to the tha ift- ift U-mands U ml mands of f tho the western farmer farmr