Show PAVING CASE TAKEN HIGHER Notwithstanding the tho appeal to the suPe court In the th paving controversy the city of o Ogden In Injustice InjustIce justice to the th property owners should do one on ot of o two thIngs Either proceed without delay to pave under the th contract awarded which caUs caU for tor a hard surface type of ot pavIng paling or enter Into an agreement by which a compromise may be made mad In keepIng keeping wIth with the demands ot of o the th property owners owner But It If the th city cHy proceeds proceed under whIch arrangements the present have bate proved proved offensive to 80 0 per percent percent percent cent ot of o tho the abutting property own own- owners ers era tile the th city commissioners commissioner sup sup that action who are w wealthy men should sIgn a a per per- personAl personal bond to reimburse the citY should the th supreme court rule as al as It dId did id with the th pa pay pay- paying pay pay-Ine v Twenty fifth street Ing on on n when the th city through misguided action ot of o its city officials paved and the court decided that the city Ity and not the th owners had had had to pay pay the th full tull costs of the Improvements This course cours would be t evidence of good faith on the th part of ot the city admInistration and Indicate the willingness ot of the city au au- authorities au- au authorities to back their attitude by their own dollus dol rs Ogden Osden city should be b guaranteed against loss If the th city commission Is declared by the supreme court to have pro pro- proceeded proceeded proceeded under faulty jurisdiction jurisdiction- The two o commissioners who have bIg property Interests can canwell well af at afford ford to demonstrate their good faith In that manner |