Show Tin ILM With Ith Ith a runner on second cond base the batsin n an hits a n ground ball balI toward tite shortstop Two men are aro out and the runner on sec second ond dashes for tor third The short short- shortstop shortstop stop gets all nil set tor for the ball and andt t then hen as It nears him he ho decides it If he takes ore st step p backward backard lie Ite wilt will be bc in better position to thrOw to tt first rBt The runner coming up from see see- second ond is directly behind him hen henhe he so 80 decides In taking the st step p backward he with the run run- runner net nr Both men fall and the tho bali goes into left lett infield The run run- run run-no U no gets irEta to his feet teet and scores ahead f t the throw to the plate by bythe bithe the left fielder There TherO was waa no In- In InI ten in-ten ten on oil the part of tb the runner ta l n Interfere It was admitted y cy o oboth I both sides eldes that the fielder IM as real real- realI really I ly Iy at nt fault for the I Wh t Wl t Is the proper ruling on such II n play TI I Thu mOll ent the runner goIng from second to third came clime Into contact with Ith the shortstop about to tomake tomake make a pia play on the ball he corn com an Interference and should ha hate haI I been cl called out retiring the th side It matters not whether there thero was nn nfl Intent on his part Art Neither does the fact that thaI the was W really responsible tor for th the collision enter Into the case The Tile fielder has the way right of way and the runner base must avoid him regardless of how hov wide of the beat beat- beaten beaten en pith path he must run to do so Tho Tue run dots dois not count of cour course because Ih the interference retired the tho side and runners can can- cannot cannot not eon not advance on such an enee ence play pIny nn or |