Show CAN STEAL COLLAR BUT NOT THE DOG I LONDON L March h The P 23 IW I old pid understanding In III law that 1 I find Is la keeping may be super super- ee ed inthe superseded by following o II 0 Is Ig keeping In the eyes o of the Lon London on Sessions I which Interpreted the code recent- recent recent recent-I I b recently ly to 10 mean mn m an th that t If It a 0 dog follows a man home the person roll followed 0 ed I I not bound hound to communicate the tact fact to the canine lne canines s a owner The 0 owner nero however it w was wa do- do decided de decided may prosecute the 1 person for tor stealing the dogs dog's collar I if It happen to bo be b wearing nearing such nn an al but he be cannot go Into court a and dogIn nl prosecute for tor stealing the dog In other words I it if a IL dog desires to select a new owner he may do doso doso so eo at his leisure |