Show TEST JEST BAN AN ON O I IN OREGON I II I Supreme Court to Pass on State Public School Law Lawi i I ARGUMENTS C CITED IT E D Question r- r Is Question State or Parents Have Most Rights I WASHINGTON G March 16 The Tho ory ory education law of oC Ore Ore- Oregon Oregon Bon gon September requiring that Septem Septem- her ber of ot next yell year I nil alt children he- he be between tween t the ages ot oC eight and six six- sixteen six sixteen teen toen with Ith a few e exceptions hall att nd public school schoot was as reached In the court today toda for oral nt two Iwo cases caes brought by the tho tate state tate to 10 have hate set aside the Injunction of the tho al district court its enforcement Although It was IlS the cae I opinion might not bring brin a so sleeping 1 ion from Cron the court on tho the contI- contI right of or tates to control the of o children a their borders the has attracted wide aide attention in educational and I elides cle cbs The Theair 11 aim iv of ot counsel brought Into court former Senator George n D Cha 1 tt S 1 k U 11 Putney Pulney and ind P Q ce 1 r for the stale late Vt D Ic Co tot foi Ih tu Society Rodely of ot the tho Sisters of or the tho Holy of oC Jesu Jesul tn mil md l Mirv anil John C each for the tho Hilt tar lar academy ST lTD TT S b T AltO TIn In argument prepared for lor to 10 today loday day counsel tot foi the state pointed out tint th 1 in m the tho 10 lower loiter ec cou t the challenge of the law vya ua a bated upon the charter charier i lights of ot school by the stat state Cor tending that thaI the Injunction hIs has boon been hosed largely upon the as- as assumption as assumption that thaI the tho PI rt rights of the pal and private school schools gran granted led b by the tate State tn-te tn would be lie ito ito- Im Impaired paired by the lie th l thu en mutt inuit attend public schools school they took 1001 the tho position that the court COUll in deciding the issue J ignore the In Investments of bt pate that any Jo- Jo loss o might lIght result reull from the tho I ex-I cx- cx ex eIe of a prO prO-lo pro Cari tur- Carillon i Lion llon by the Otate did not constitute I an ful taking of Opert i SCHOOLS lIO I 1 Counsel for Cor the on the tha oll r hand and based their I Ion on the contention Ion that thai the n stew w school law violated the tire rights of or liberty and property se- se se-cund se cured by the constitution that It amounted to ft n denial of the Iho rights ot of thoe e Collo following Ing the tho useful oc- oc oc of conducting a chool parental control met OHI chil children Iren dron and e J tho the police pollee poster r of the stat state slate lIters was stat a a con con- con lor right of o those thoe chartes ell ed b bi tire tho stile tte Itlo 10 lo conduct 11 hate tire Iho Curt he- he held the Itle could not lle away assay ChOO IT n I l I n co co the teat leal of tire the I law w as is d a bv hi b the tho s for lor too 10 I private schools school a as one to complete complete- completely I ly destroy detroy schools I in Iho Uro stall sw l Insisting that thaI should thIs be permitted sChools school coll colleges college ge and CI c uld l alto alio be brought under tinder Itlo counsel tot toi the tho ho School contended this would mean that only those subjects could ouid be taught I and tho-e tho tho e and e e pounded c pounded which the tho tate approved d The Tho Seventh ra na Flay Ad Adv enlists and anti and foreign ml missionary 1 0 so- so so societies clettes cletie of Ib the T church p a BS ft lend or the tho court flied filed briefs att the la lass lasson on 00 |