Ogden Standard-Examiner | 1923-12-02 | Page 29 | Areson Case Writ Denied

l f ARESON CASE WRIT aMM DENIED Supreme Court Rejects Plea Made In Eden Threat Hearing I el Th The supreme me court Saturday Saturday de- de de denied flied nied 11 1 Nell Areson of or Ogden den all a writ tit of habeas corpus and he I was as ordered remanded to the cus cus- cus- cus custody custody custody tody of o of Sh Sheriff or of W Weber l er county on a 1 chargo charge or of threatening banco of or the th p peace nce i A Aleson I son was ws arrested on com com- comI complaint plaint corn I plaint filed rued bv by Geoge A of oC oCl l den In the tho district court COlIt roller charges char him with nith making makinI certain specific threats of or personal f I and claming claiming that unless I Id I'd I mad nd placed under security y to keep heel the peace peacy I C Areson would Mould cart carl caro oat his Ids t I II FU I I George S Darker Barter or of or the Iho district cowl sitting as a 11 ma magistrate held Areson to 2000 bond for keeping the peace pace ant J in to default deault o of Ih this bond hond lie Je was as placed In custod In inthe inthe the county jail Areson ho however e er chimed I the he complaint to be insufficient to state stale staten stalen n a cause of or action nellon He attached tIe the jurisdiction of or the court on the I grounds that no crime cilmi had b been committed but was Mas a only feared and ad appealed to 10 the supreme court on habeas corpus onI i I Justice James Jaynes W V Cherry hold holds I the he case to be specifically covered co co ered I I J by b the statute and dismisses ses this objection I On the sufficiency of or the eI 1 eil-dence eil I i dence to uphold the district COUI court t findings the supreme court Is un unable able to make mahe ant an findings Cs under habeas corpus accord I accord accord- according ins accord Ing to the rule A As a 1 result the I court points out It Is unprepared to say as a D matter of law that I I sworn proof of oC a threatened offense oense and the belief belleC that the th treat 1 will 1111 willbe I be carried Into execution Is or Is not sufficient to authorize a magis to conclude there the e I is Just jut rea-I rea rea- rea reason reason i I son to fear the commission lon of or a i crime and Issue a a warrant arrant of oC ar- ar iest I ar-I This and the sufficiency of the evidence must 10 be determined on regular appeal