| Show conflicting reports result in Ou question estion on railroad Sch schedule eduie two twp different rep lepors received in price thi ehlt week relative ti td the proposed changing hangl nj of flie railroad wt 01 train no 2 chich at r rife riven here at it 1215 in the evening have hive caused price peole tu to I 1 just what lilure arrangements will I 1 oe on made jn in o 0 at effort to clear up the matter Se detarr tary II 11 toy of the char bet of ti writing to ale at of the railroad rall roal at denver ani ant e expect an early tite the first aport rp ort su edly from jn of del louree beaked the its chan set ef of cece e s to the effect that the D A it R 0 G W will put a new passenger pa enger train heddle hed Lle into effect january 4 and that train 0 a 2 train salt lake like will 1 probably not top here Ifo be the second report which Is also teo from a relia ie to Is to the effect that no 2 will carry the map instead of 0 no 4 and that it wilt will 1 ifante avo silt uko tako about 9 0 00 0 p m tw L sue iab au r li it 0 r it present time tic fo no 4 arnat in price a little after 7 00 p in if this plan is s followed complete tom flete mail 11 oat out 0 83 salt it uke lake for the nure entire 2 will bo be on the train member members of the board of birto 0 or of the chamber hai chT disen dl enid sied the tint first rumor at the weekly guettl 1 tit tue e a day flud it wn decided to laveeta gate gets the matter and if the report was ra well forr ded to protest rah accio n if te first plan Is tattled out lapress and late mall mail from salt Satt 1790 will be b nearly a id day |
