Show with I 1 both loth hands A in n inner circle of members of clubs is eu en aw im n a campaign to gain for women all their kelcil rights the goal of which is equality of women with men meu before the law in every few 4 men desire to deny them this equably it is A 4 surprise to many who wi not given real thought to the subject that they do not now noir possess it it mean seems to be the common idea that the nineteenth amendment made teem mens equals in a leral sense however that is a mistaken idea they were given civil rights and the ballot ballut on n a it par pur with men but here there are numerous statutes statute a and judge waie laws lairs that prevent this equality it is 13 these states and court decisions the hitter used ly by courts as law by which to measure their oin 0 decisions that the wo men want removed that seems to be perfectly proper save only in the case of laws designed to protect women on grounds of ab differ difference enco from men wo men are the moth mother let of the race A As such i chiy perform a function anil have natural duties from men it is durable even needs nc cessar sar to con coni servo them in this under protection of iho law lion evv it Is pot lot laws cf tins tills kind against which they war though a few radicals would ii v apo out c even veil such enactments enact menta they want all property inheritance and all iko ike legal differences between the sties wiped out but bug it is noticeable that they verify just those anch wwi seem to be a handicap to toa I 1 them and not those that appear to give them an advantage Yan tage there they bold nn rin with both hands one gripping their new equality and the other clinch clinching ingi taw old advantage and the courts arc slow to eli creange clinge old precedents in such cases i for instance take the tile mitter nit ter of a alimony emony allow anic ande of that has been made in the past on the theory that the male is the money earner and the woman the home keeper when separated she lise iaci her meal ticket and the husband ii is held by the court responsibly for her having one even when be ceases to bo glicr er husband but that Is not equality recently in a san Francl froncisco itco a husband without means was ordered to pay alimony to hn lim divorced w wife e w who 0 had an ample income ot of her own there seems to bf 1 no feminine outcry against the inequality ot of all mony but that too will come with other changes in the law lairs for women the justice in euch such case cases will have to be decided by the judge after all what women are for is justice |