OCR Text |
Show Chandler Brothers lodes, same sut-vey sut-vey number. Said lode Is located In SE4 Sec. 27, Township 3 South, Range t West. , : The claims nearest to, adjoining and In conflict with, aald Marne Lode, a shown by the official plat of survey, are as follows: Lot No. 288, Stanley Lode, Survey No. 4148, Howard Lode, Survey No. 4148. Chandler Brothers Lode, Survey Sur-vey No. 4148, Survey 4605 Tilden No. . Survey No. 4148 Elmore, Survey Sur-vey No. 4148 Abbetross, Survey No. 3923, Cape Cod (amend). Survey No. 3745 Exchange, Survey No. 8791 Jack Rabbit. The location notice covering said claim is recorded In Book "K" of Locations, Lo-cations, pane 273, of the records of Salt Lake County, State of Utah. ELI F. TAYLOR, Register. Dated this 17th day of June, 1927. FlrBt publication June 23, 1927. Last Publication Aug. 18, 1927. UNITED STATES LAND OFFICE Salt Lake City, Utah, June 17,1927. Serial No. 044724 Notice Is hereby given, that Utah Apex Mining Company, a corporation, by and through Robert L. Judd, Ita duly constituted attorney-in-fact, whose postofflce address Is 409 Kearns Building, Salt Lake City, Utah, on behatf of itself has filed an application for patent for that certain cer-tain lode mining claim known as the Marne Lode Mining Claim, situated in the West Mountain Mining District, Dis-trict, Salt Lake County, State of Utah, and designated by the field notes and official plat on file in this office as Mineral Survey No. 6824, said Mineral Survey No. 6824 being described as follows, to-wlt: Commencing at Post No. 1, a corner cor-ner of the claim from which the Quarter Section corner between Section Sec-tion 26 and 27, Township 3 South, Range 3 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, bears North 61 13' East 2034.6 feet distant, thence North 85 46 West 140.0 feet to Post No. 2; thence South 4 29' West, 672.4 feet to Post No. 3; thence South 85 46' East 140.0 feet to Post No. 4; thence North 4 29' East 672.4 feet to Post No. 1. Containing an area of 2.161 acres. Expressly excluding and exempting ex-empting from said area, however, all that portion of this lode mining claim Ih conflict with Lot No. 288, Stanley lode; Survey No. 4148, Howard Lode exclusive of its conflict with said Lot No. 88; Survey No. 4148, Chandler Brothers lode, exclusive of Its conflict con-flict with said Lot No. 288; and Survey Sur-vey No. 4148, Elmore lode, exclusive of its conflict with said Howard and |