Show public assistance pe decreases creases morgan county N n august 1950 and aug betwee total number of per pei 1 the public assistance in county deer decreased eased 6 per n goo to depoi t released au ts t utah FOL foundation in dadon non k by 01 research research h R gency agency ant ta the state there has what bout decrease during percent 91 j 08 the percent ot aa ja alon receiving assistance in i county during allgur august rt 1951 coin compared pared with a 1 percent 1 3 13 3 to percentage of per tat rhe ne the reduction study reveals in the 0 number of recipients in utah lias has are possible C cost ost ot of living in ejde I 1 wes in welfare re grants tor for those remaining ou on the public apa rolls foundation au an gilante gi lance observe A major factor in fit increases increase es has been the ail grant cushion the impact of to X living casu for individuals pendent peB dent upon pon public assistance ri report continues yearly expenditure for public welfare during the fiscal year end 1351 amounted anio to 11 eipl the report states of this or percent of total came from state funds a or percent or of the federal aid ai time came from lit compared with other states by higher than av iise aper per capita expenditures for he assistance a ith lower than jimige resources as measured by wea as capita pits income to meet these andl lures the foundation study gwei average assistance ante brints in utah also are consider ij 0 higher than those of most oth e open records developments leading to the reit w move more by congress to amend a federal Feil cral social security act to bior states to open their welfare wits wis to public inspection are aked ai ad in the utah foundation re 14 A summary ot of major argusta both tor for and against open ii elfare rolls in utah Is include ail d lithe lathe study tte tie fact act that utah does not hold ww responsible for the of 0 welfare recipients is not milicent Mili tent with the requirements a relatives tives must meet the cost care at tile the state ke institutions according to Fou dation analysts irresponsible supervised 4 although it is known that somo some vare tore recipients have hae dissipated I 1 wr to public assistance grants on milr items liquor and gambits rather aher than purchasing basic I 1 titles for their families fed ft c 1 regulations prohibit any ac my IT on oil the part of state and lo 10 W Mel fare agencies to supervise a grants in which te beneral government participate 11 the hie foundation study notes in ae general assistance program d roaey ey is provided from estate vm v kah m ud d the state Is not bound these federal regulations in eal cases the agency may and regulate balate the expenditure of illa made to kno known wit alcoholics 11 leport relates according to ma lt ali foundation report some wl involving persons incapable eang their owns own af affairs f airs have la 14 a transferred fro from in one of the a 21 1 participation programs to wineral assistance program alre the expenditure of 0 grants 41 w ba supervised by the agency practice fac ilce however involves ku ss of federal aid to the state 74 claimed the l tah Found foundation 4 on report dis 64 that certain welfare necip it wert that th oy y do da not ot re any 7 support f rota relatives tives ea claim 0 1 i hese e same me re aau Is 8 de dependents is tor for federal olzo tax 1 pa Dur purposes poses detection ot of cases is 18 lmh ith made extremely er emely dif by the lack 9 ahto nation of a tree free exchange q between the fed eau of internal halh ill revenue 6 10 k X department of 0 pub elfare elfar the report repart notes lies sage te be ot of the uniform no cipro the tT 8 and support act eteh session of the 1951 ke ta makes culta wt it more 14 for w husbands and fathers ca do 14 legal Obliga obligations tiou to their ai k it 1 by moving out of the state pointed k stud out by the dounda 10 Y 5 44 nce many deserted la es k become abbi idies the a e public assistance tit eventually may prove all important influence up Mendi turea tures |