Show THINK THIS OVER 1 Whether ti we e are willing to admit it or not every one one ne of u who ho sticks to his work 52 weeks in the year on the ground th tha he cant afford to take a vacation is wrong about it There i ino no doubt but most of us is in such a position financially that th loss of income for two weeks or even a single week would impose im impose impose pose an additional hardship 3 on us And yet figured from il U standpoint sandpoint of health instead 01 or from a dollar dollar- dollar cent cent nd-cent angle w w would uld be ahead in the run long if we took at least one week o 0 of every year for genuine rest Even a piece of machinery will run better and last longer it is is permitted to remain idle occasionally Then rhen why isn't tl ti same thing true of the human machine Owners of big indu trial triai p plants have found that they get greater production out their workers if they give them a weeks week's vacation every yea yem they actually y do more work i iQ a 50 weeks than they would in 55 5 5 working straight through without the brief summer mid-summer rest When all is said and done were we're only going to be here once and it is up to each one of us to try and prolong his stay on as long as possible Nobody in Manti 1 is going to starve to death if he lays down his work Vork for a week or two each year and gets away from it if only for a few fe miles distance He is sure to come back so greatly improved physically that he can easily make up for the loss in actual money y hes he's pretty retty p pin apt to save it itin itin in doctors doctor's bills bins and medicines Well We'll have o 0 admit since weve we've studied both sides of it that a vacation is after all a sensible investments investment Its It's just an old-fashioned old idea that its it's a luxury Figured from the standpoint of health and adding to our ur years l its it's a necessity The man who says I cant can't afford to quit works work s even for a day dayis is wrong |