Show utah supreme court decides local cases two lawsuits of local interest were recently decided by t the it e supreme court of the state of utah involving the claims of 0 mallard county litigants lumber company vs campbell building co this case was originally brought about tour four years yearn ago by the mcbride lumber company in its own behalf and tor for the benefit of all material men and laborers having claims against the contractors on oil the kanosh dog valley highway claims amounting to between 20 ind and 30 thousand dollars were outstanding and under tinder the present law there was s a 1 limited 1 ml t e d ti time m 0 w within lt hi il t vas which to n start tar t t the h e a action e t N which vi bici i w was a s computed only after completion and final settlement of the aba project prole ct otherwise suit could not be brought successfully against the surety on the contractors bond this complicated statute in connection with the records of the state road commission made a very complicated legal problem upon which a serious difference of opinion existed among attorneys in the state the law firm of cline wilson and cline represented the mcbride mcgride lumber company and took the position that all creditors of the construction company should join in the suit by a complaint complain tin fil intervention within the time specified in a notice they caused to be published in this newspaper accordingly many of the tha creditors cattle came into the suit that other otherwise wige would have lost their claims forever as was the sad caso case in some instances the case was tried without a jury only after the defendants had compelled the parties to go to the supreme court to determine the right of the local court to hear the case at that time tile the local district court virtually held for the claims of all creditors from the decision the appeal of the present case was wag taken A particular defense being made against the allowance of interest for these past tour four years in favor of the creditors the recent decision sustained the lower court decision and constituted a complete victory tor for the creditors giving them their costs and interest since their claims were due those these who have been represented in the suit stilt by the firm of local attorneys have been advised that it will be about twenty days before they may expect the remittitur tur from the sup reme court paxton paton vs dearden this action was a damage suit brought by frank paxton of kanosh against thomas De deliden attlen ind and eborn as dearden jr ot of garrison as a of some previous dealing of the parties with the state land board which had resulted in tile the cancellation of a lea lease leae e of paxton on oil lands landh in snake valley which the acar dens bought front from the state the lower court without a jury ga gave vs paxton a judgment of with costs in a suit for US an appeal was taken by paxton and the I 1 he Dear De ardena denit through their attorneys cline wilson cline filed a noss appeal claiming that cost should be assessed against paxton tills this position was sustained by the supreme court in the recent decla toll ion |