Show COUNTY ATTORNEY WRITES ION ON STATUS OF DRAINAGE controversy 4 0 dear editor this lettea letter Is a written to correct certain dorrofu tha hava been made and circulated c among tho the public and p I 1 hicie in tile the public that thoy they shall sey sao the truth C in III all three salt lake papers of 00 of mai maich ell and tha the SOth of marh respectively thero appeal legations loga lega tlona tiona that were false concerning the the casella anse hi which Millard county was involved in after stating that iffat the bondholders bond holders oj 91 millard mallard Dist districts riots 2 and i 3 had obtained obtain od for L there were assertions that officials of millard county hod conspired to 1 pel freeze out tile the by allowing tile hilr ir distri ct and gei loral taxes to fo remain delinquent for to tho the statutory period and andt lien then obtain tax deeds H to ti tho 0 land 11 in ili iho and anddess DOB eret oret tile tho next issue both papers fc stated tt they had been misinformed conferring tho the officials of county as ab they had not been chnag oj ad with fraud in thorf correction Is the truth tho judgments SJ obeal obtained 1 I ca had nothing to do with mth 1 j milia mallard rd county anymore than thadia a farel crosure d of a mortgage on art your land a lian has to do litif aitla mitla millard rd county I 1 believe the peo people ale of 0 this county are I 1 fair enough to a admit that this correction cora cara onby by the papers themselves vindicate i te the county bounty flici ic fals i the county coin commissioners ners arid and county treasurer were defendants in fai two suits the day a atter ate I 1 T tho the above 0 case was head the rejon tho county i officials never were connected aulta but sonie vent up as ab witnesses in those cases cases they apro charged arged with conspiracy to defeat the bondholders bond bon holders out oe of cei trill nion mail ay but n naver to defeat tile the original bond bonds When the question of colis e r i acy ticy came D johnson lie he refused to allow the ilia to abnit K i t as aiu f II 11 wa to v 62 r nd nota alie ob ove any connection in that thai respect 1 11 in other words th the e 1 waa so lind and trivial not having any grounds that the colar court would not even consent to it hear oar tUn tillay about it wat wits was done in tha that case casa was a judgment wo we all male make ini mistakes stakes of judgment no v how b bright I 1 we might he be I 1 believe tile the veople people of this county will blame cany any officials of millard county if he makes a mistake of judgment who when n lie he tries to do what is a right rap reports orts navo avo come to some of us that some people BEY say the cauntay county i is 18 corrupt that are ara worse lails lala 4 now than ec eca I 1 chal challenge lengo any of bf the public to make a detailed da tailed survey a of any in 11 illard county andriy tg to find car cor r rup u idu or inefficiency I 1 inaco mabb this ob il atlin you will tand no better taking all of them toge together 0 than are found folind ln in millar mallard r id county Iou nty by the recent act complained of you haap n not ot lost ona olza cent of your money maney it itis ilja is all here if you do not believe this flits statement follow tile the next official cla audit r that hat 1 is mado made octha co Coun un 1 yand nd it ii no not t true we are not asking ashing for u 1 praise nor trying to defond orv ln lipiano ny Me wt k Is ia for you to think and rea read bora ore saying a 0 this or that in disparagement of your county officers cors who have en onest nes I 1 wurth th publia wl aft to stand in our of wilah stand as ab yer per 0 manent our and believe that the a g and mall cloua you have a heard hear d rn ili disparagement of county pl 93 ficiala wil be dismissed fr from 0 6 your biln riling tl aso so tar far as their being the berned 0 0 Z 1 I 1 hect fully milton melville ti ac bounty 1 attorney 0 0 0 |