Show T THE k E FINANCIAL akl QUESTION VS TARIFF 03 3 L islo O atlie of this country coi has fias araks in almost mry campaign the ta arii schuld bt be the issue iss ue D SSP alya always j r found it berer asias aou d easily didds di ilde a ac 5 S it is a question tat is r very coia plex ac fo the di averene v e rage vy 1 I essae lade ea an which h asp pail to secal arn ind e 2 sc the leaders rf afla Temo cratic and Be publican have bavo mutual ly agreed for fair solon sd that the tariff was great issue the 3 average g apter n th athass parties without seriously seri busly con considering the ha matter and a ef invests iiron apon ma part bus settled down tithe idea that thal th the a tariff is the 0 th thae lias avre on halt half the people all n cea to tariffs fis i to high and ilia iho other hal b ailt to ahe fact that the tariff is too law W J oa the enaire Sn ancial question the campa fig bosk boak of democracy 0 cracy ii antins fita while it devotes one hundred 1 ad d e eleven I 1 rt paces to jhc thc s so C ot itis 1 ver very P plain shat ile old parties arago are go 10 osia IS to force for the tariff tana to the 90 froner and try to i is nore nare fhe li lecial cial que question astl on altogether the P republicans cs s ireat areat york tork on an the samel bame line lne ander aad ara del agh ted ali I 1 althey they gaii can fig ht ahei r the same old ground 3 3 t thera thare are great many hones democrats and 41 who candidly 0 1 beliar aji f ane 1 l ea I 1 is the the great iss issue ue ci 0 s s orthe benefit cf ta such we have undertaken atia ia M this article to pratt the grea ue arsha 10 i ii quest question ion in ia A m ed ea today is lae dr an U taft secondary aary ary ir in the hiie following table ble shows the amount af tariff ald b the necessaries st His which ha U bibi biby each regu jt it 1 hawa the amount funded the tae serife otla the iala diw V 1 and u tile el law a VV 5 c a if y dere 51 2 61 s 3 h is z K r r 9 Z ajr s eess C cutca boot p ss i s aa ready aa 9 41 kf ULU MA city caw s lol I 1 lea 4 2 Irva T aa U cutlery tty a ral webb ae 5 3 asna I 1 enec is v W qu aiom siom aad TZ soot ao 4 02 00 20 r 25 5 sw U i ls am VW w M t fw SW winal 88 IS 29 ati tt i 61 caw act g W B we WaS fiad hy by axe th ave E sas that de democrats kemu are siget w kaji F 41 MV i gnad 0 aund z ill opler waw arty I 1 W t seebie seeB te difert dif 10 S 1 fc t luw t lawa law oCtal ri Sll ife I 1 IT int CW la 10 sr tl 5 ay te t 5 sa awba sea iw ae a 1 y s MT WW gg Q A 1 0 y 7 fore forc it must be ba this that all this turriff nick nicketie etis a bom fa alus table wi can see erin etly the relation which chic tag farn iera s v i both the old parties birtles so fai fi faias ms ims i as the tariff fis concerned As thelah the law hr w stands the tha adir M tam e uce ence to te farmer between tha ibe dem bm I 1 fud aud republican parties on im I 1 I 1 ha question iliin mea loease sifred ed lu ia d ollard and cents is sa 6 allen the gsg when narrowed down dawa is W whether the ahe farmer will pay 2112 it 12 tariff more mo ri or less lesa au aljy s wan etenne hs th amney question and sees how bow mr mir ia 4 ma robbed bel anit plundered d each b by X the money power of the world iba uia taw ass dwi di vinalea il inta E 3 sa 1 iter laiful leance bov ed facts ad sea how ans fernier or effected c ed lj by vict ons financial jSn ancial legisla leg afoa pd thal bave beba crying 1 fl order to drown the cries of bred peocla ltv lef us ug take as atio average crop 0 ibe cott co I 1 ton tan tales bales ing pounds each atonal a total of patu ids ls we find that jha js price of of 1872 the year before silver was was d worthA om 17 aitto 0 15 pr par pound tim tha aye average rag price bein about 20 cents the tea za ian baled balea of cotton jit at thatis I 1 meat 20 costs per pounds coundi oula tet set the dinner ir floo i y the sa same jen bales cottu now at the be fres present j cut prica priced of 6 ce cents n ii a per pound aund would we ftc from these figures figi iris that iame some ow w or sasao so how bow elso tha eaton tar aw hasten robbed of dollars 7 on oa his yean production product iou of cotten tho crop that ha produced Trod in 1872 cost gf no EO more labor than t h hog t crop ho b C produced dur din in 1394 1894 then why is ij this difference of abet see sesa q now bor hoy it its at wi 1 take 1006 blushed 0 f the average crop dia 1872 the tha I 1 belore silver ve aze d wheat w 65 to basul tr C a in 1872 1372 v woold j have bettes the farma 56 T Y ice ra wheat is fi 50 I 1 per basliel 1 ei and 1000 bushels brings bilies ieli ff ia for tisane did S w in T chy 13 n i j wh Is ia lk that robs the U farmer anier of ibbs as sw as S fco il tariff 3 aiom the above fads facts we see that tl the cotton jar fanner paid fa bariff riffin in i 1872 18 70 as d rece received ayed 1000 for h hiscott aico oa cro crop p BOW in tae ahe year 1894 6 pay pays a ja nat st 60 cen cents ts less than in 1672 irad deceives aco foghis crop aboss of th Thew farmer paying the azzi bunt pt tariff as alcove above receive received 1750 for his crop in be act re fl betes a loss of 0 1 1250 25 50 in kotlier tl these fa hato bay 0 bee bean n fighting over that 2112 tariff tha dide difference cg to io them theia the ana republica on that ihal q question 11 while e the ma n ey power lisa has s wealthily fealt hily stepped in and rabea the cotton cotton baisar of 70 wheat raise s roi of 1250 Q 0 3 to the cottan rais the money quest iori Olt is eb sa a much s aboto athe the tar tariff a as sn an issue as COO 05 ir 00 Is ift above and to the wheat j maisez as aa 1250 is asaye above 2112 aa when v the tha div farmers 1 of this thia study the financial I 1 and 1 realize biow r bey have by the se of the destruction q of tho them tharo will abut one issue rax mid that will wib bo the monfry at Q question salm i M |