OCR Text |
Show '"Jho'llcHuIjftc'nn'fB glad to pilnt tho billing oJurffio J.iA. Hon oil, In the Peterson ,. Kames, nnd Kewley-Crcssnl ciiscfl, lu (till in thjs Issue for the perusal of Its readers. It will be observed ob-served that the contention of thh paper, nnd ihc mayor nnd republican mcmticrs of the coilncll concerning the"law7 lhe"rulcs, "proceduie, etc., are upheld In every Instance. Not In (no single case Is the ruling ndversc, ami' thu only tlncnd "on'whlch Peterson Peter-son el nl. won. Is the matter of 'roj-cording 'roj-cording the vote In tho Journal." The paits of the ruling In capital letters Is lespectfully submitted to those gentlemen who hnve been busy pine-Ing pine-Ing thelf own conduction, and far fetched Interpretation on the snme. The reference (o the Sheets case, thp lecent law covering the case at Is Htle, etc., Willi certainly bo bitter pills for these gentlemen. After having hav-ing dlgcste'd the same we wouli like To ask If It Is" not In order to 'recnllt' that bon fire. , |