OCR Text |
Show Rinal Decree Entered ;i I Settling Water Case i i H Wednesday thu pnrtlcs to tho (lis- Bute wlicrclu the wator or tho Plena Jl H,t orovo system wns In tllsputo np- l Hnrrd In court at Provo nnd settled A' ft- Htlimlntloii nt u totnl court cost B $1.1.90. tlic ciisc of Murk Hczzuiit B ill. vs. Pleasant Orovo City, thnt at Bc lime threatened to cobL thouBnuds B dollnrs and to almost disrupt the immunity. Both 8,(1'' "ru fl)llcltntlng civl' olh-h olh-h B over the happy ending of tho dls--.Bitc mid everybody Rccms to bo well Htlsned. From tho best Information "iJKtnlmiblo It nppciirB thnt tho city got H thnt It was entitled to and n sulll-netflciit sulll-netflciit quantity for nil domestic pur-,c,r-lM)Scs. '." ItB when tho case was commenced this 1 rH,pcr strongly advised the course thnt 'licnB'T Hnnlly taken nnd subsequent rc-'OtitfBilts rc-'OtitfBilts amply prove the wisdom of' the 1 luftlvlcc. So many arc Interested In the '.''.fBinl adjustment thnt wo reproduce In vhli'B11 ,nc dccrcc nB ll ls "ow " tno X. aiivlclal record: mlgm Decree. 8t jBTnl8 cnUB0 cnmc " for lr'"' ""' lioroBth dny of Apr"' ,9H' at I,roVO' soBtnh, before Hon. A. U. Morgan, Judge, Besldlng without a Jury; 8. It. Thur- Han, Ksqulre, appearing ns nttorney ftr the plnlntlffB, nnd Hnrvoy Cluff, B"iulre. ns attorney for tho defon- e nu'H)tfli The respective pnrtles by their "!att'Bld attorneys having stipulated in ii 'Be" court ,nal ""dings of fnct and """'(ncluslous of law bo waived, nnd the " auB"0W'"B decree entered, It Is thcro- Hrc ordered, adjudged nnd decreed 10(1 0lWint tho defendant, IMnBnnt (Jrove oo3te:,y, s tho owner of 1.35 cubic feet knock water per second of tho wntera of renc.Wattic Creek, In I'lnli County, Utah. '00S,tf8crlbed in the complaint, nnd Its iiockergt0 thereto Is hereby nulotcd and 1"" Shrined. ut usThat the said defendant, I'lensant B KWrovo City, Ir not the owner of any ncro!!,pr quantity of wntcr whalover re tn-ithlti the I'lensant Grove Irrigation 003'p,Hf8tcm, In any manner of form, except aiiMDjK, rRi,t to manage, control nnd cIIb-stand!BUtn cIIb-stand!BUtn the aamo nmong tho ownors scour Bt users thereof and tho ownership ' SUCB 80Vcn ,,n' throo-nunrtor acres of ininoiHKtcr for city cemetery and one acre ito water for city hall, aside from the ls thfw, second feet for waterworks, ys eiHrimt the plaintiffs and other per-ihIujMis per-ihIujMis whom they represent nro tho llsv ftucrs of tho remainder of tho wnt-ml&-s of said Dottle Creek nnd their i btajHio thereto Is hereby (piloted nml nf-nd nf-nd h'.icmd. Th'BThnt the waters of said llattlo w"Wcek shall bo divided between tho renscrrticB hereto in tho proportloim ' an0ve stated at tho place whero It Is thlngw divided nenr tho mouth or tho lnir ,ac"yo" of miA creek "'id the portion itlsflcnsurcd to plaintiffs herein shnll bo I'wductcd by menus of a wator tight ostliifM)U without loss or diminution to the 'O vvlBjst ona of tho present plpo lino i inorMiveylng tho same, excepting tho diss iSter now helng diverted nnd usd ters. M partlPB at tho weir. Flint tho defendant shall, ul itn own i JB)nl,8e construct nnd porpctunlly ir .iolltiln good rc,,nri Hultnble and dent monsurlug dcvlccB nt the Hint of division of Bald water and ' rB'struct and porpctunlly maintain a Bad nnd sufficient wnter tlgltf. plpe- .... "-Mo to carry tho wntcr hereby award 9 to tho plaintiffs without loss or Kninutlon from tho point of dlvlnlon !i$the west end of the pipeline a it iw oxlats. jfThat In tho event a dispute nriseH Mto whether or not said pipeline in iMlng water the snmo shall bo ro-freil ro-freil to tho water commlsBloucr relnaftcr provided for, nnd If in his ' tgmnnt said pipeline in defective Bl Is not safely conducting nil of Wt wator awarded to plaintiffs to Hit Hi of said pipeline, or in the even' Bd commissioner Is in doubt and Bnnot accurately determine the mat pi H to his own satisfaction without n cl Hnsurement of Iho quantity of water H'lng to the west end of said plpo- m. then It Rhall bo tho duty of the jHendnnt, nt Its own expense upon ION MUC8t "f Bald commissioner to nsure said water or cause It to be T Sasured, both nt tho point of dills 1 nnd at tho nutlet of mild pipeline H tho purpose of determining the fSpRtlntl 111 fllut.nln Wbnt n wnter coinmissionernpabli . accurately nieasurlug flowing wat H and deterinuing the (iiantil.v ui Breof shall bo appointed from tlnu H time by tho court (and for that Wrpose jurlsdjction Is hereby to ned), whoso duty It shnll be t( asure said water and make proper Blilo" ",pm)f '"id determlno th ' Bintlty flowing to each of tho par ublCiliBf herein whenever there Is n ills we enncernlug tho snmo, and in bin wginent It is necessary In order tr jHerinlne the quantity flowing t' rii of spM pnrlles, In Iho event Bjt the eouimlssloner refuses to or M " mriisureinent of said water Ii I1' "f dlspuie, Mien either plnlnllffH "lAilSii '""l mn"' "r,nr reasonabl' Iflfloo to the other parly, make such r"1H,,r,nient mid (In- expense thereof .1 ...i fS ."' ,ml11 by "l0 lrly whleh faiU yEr,Bpi'l,,,sh l,K H'do or the dispute. I'll I IS "' 8"1'1 commissioner shall per-m per-m such other ilulleB relallng lo lh jtfjiKiirnmenl mid division or siibt iirrniK'' W,r "" M,,,' l"' necessary lo enrrj ,i-iit if. ,..Mln tpr'ii or IIHs decree, mid nl. ii" Fi " "" """'8 '' Hubjeet to lh iers or tho court In respect lo Hie T R,!,,,,r8 ''''Icrmlned herebv. 'liat Kriinlt Weill, Is hoVeby ap Wnteii water commissioner 'lis here provided, and shall servo' In said "'t'lty during Iho pleasure or Hie cd. mirt mid until his Miccnaaor U duly i rvii W",,l,,''l-' W",,l,,''l-' Ulhat the costs of this action shull be equally divided between tho pnrtles pnr-tles plnlntlrr nnd defendant,. and may be taxed accordingly. A. H. MOUOAN, Judge. Dated at Provo, Utah, this 2Ulh day of April, 1911. ' |