| OCR Text |
Show ft"' 5t mL The Pumping Plant. H - IK At the mci'tinfr of stockholders K Br "1C 'c''' lrr'8nt'on Company If K '" held Saturday evening, considcr- & fiLv ae opposition was expressed to K ! l'lc ProPOJl'0r f pumping water m ! from Utah Lake. Tlic opposi- tf k tion came from farmers in the old SB & l "c'1 w'10 arc a'r'y vvc" supplied fl "w ' " with water and who therefore ob- W & 1 ject to being taxed far the benelit M T of others. I I :' It is evident that some plan la ti$ w'" 'iave to c 'cV'Scd whereby jft 9 the bnrdeti of expense will be P ,ff borne by those who "are most J ' " benofiled. The solving of this JT s question will remove what now Hs T'll seems to be the greatest obstacle KfiL h- n l'ie wny l'lc Proicct',s success BB While a few persons seem to RFML doubt the practicability of pump- ? wff "g water So or 6o feet for irriga- , IK. tion purposes experts and other W.m ' persons who have given much at- mW tention to studying such questions fft? declare that the direct gains in & yield per acre would fully justify 'rcs all expenditure of money in in- , if M stalling and maintaining such a tyJL' plant as the one proposed., gj Though figures covering the IjjWv cost have been submitted by at BjjGJT least one engineer, the water IfjEf board has been instructed to se- BSB cure other estimates. These, to- flBpf guthe'r with other information, I jjjBa will be reported to the people at f sBjL n uturu Meeting Hy It is clear that a vote last Sat- Ml urday night would have been n HB hasty action. Nobody desires an I A expenditure of money without re- HS-' suits that fully justify it, neither B should the mistake be made of Ef cutting off a water supply now B available but no doubt would soon mt be abvorbed by others. |
