Show school Amend amendments amendment men ts to equalize compared with the wealthiest 16 SC r fr arl avs aft ita it 1 school district has less 13 than ono ns its much taxable wealth with which to kopro pro for tile education of 0 eighth as many pupils tho the result la Is that the kane district taxpayers lax must have a school tax levy nearly twice as ae high as that which prevails in the richest non metro politan district to finance an n ed w atio nol program Iny involving ax expenditure pend iture 0 of 2671 per classroom clasi room unit compere compared ato to the iho per classroom program jordan district Is ili able to provide with a 6 mill all levy figures compiled by the utah state school office ellow chow that kane school district hns has 19 46 asse assessed seed valuation of com compared with tho the valuation fing in tho the jordan district with property tax levies being an important source of revenue for 01 tho dIstrI districts Ws school program pro giam loco local property owners find themselves paying a school tax levy of 15 mills to finance the education ot pup puella alls in average dally daily attendance while property owners in n the states richest non metro politan district pay bay only 76 mill lov levy to cnance an educational program graifor for lupilo attendance are thosa compiled by the santo school office for 1946 46 tho the per classroom are of transportation costs capital outlay and debt ier service the adoption of amendt hento no 3 and 4 will in no way our cur tall tile the excellence odthe of tho program which la is possible lit in the jordan district yot yet many ot at the inequalities existing in current ine methods thode of school finance would be eliminated Eau education cation Is it a state function the constitution provides that the state shall ahall provide pr ovile tor for a uniform system of schools clearly stating dating that education la is a state function and not ono one restricted sole solely lr to tile the responsibility of the district |