Show i i NO r l. l f Here Herc is another thing that dl didn't nt t l happen hut but was In the Herald V The organ has Intimated that Justice Justice Jus Jus- tice McCarty McCarly and one of oC his asso- asso aoI ao- I s i elates on the Supreme bench deci decided e against the tho machine councilmen because because be be- cause of ot ulterior improper In- In I f I r l The Herald Berhl Is in error Assuming J I that The Republican rs is the he organ p rather coarsely referred to to permit us to state that we ve have havo never at an any l time even cven remotely suggested that hat t. t Justice McCarty or 01 any other member n of or the Supreme court had decided the thc Ogden cases ces against Chambers anti and Cra because of oC ulterior or Improper f i er cr influences We Ve do not now an and we never nevern neverin n the post pMt have seen how f thc they could decide those cases other l. l than Omil as the they did The law is perfectly perfectly per per- 1 plain The offense had been leen proved as charged charge and tho tim court could not have ruled differently No one Is justified instilled In saying saIng The rue Republican cherishes even a suspicion sus sus- en e F. F that influences affected affect Improper ed tho the court in that maler matter Ye We did dil express astonishment at atho atthe S the ho gross gros Impropriety of two members S of the court discussing the thc ca case e with wIh I the Tribune while It I was sas pending S And VC we ie can ean not yet justify that very remarkable action acton But Dul we are arc by no ii J means mens condemning the court for its Hs ruling I S If I f you ou S say we intimated that AN MADE exert ul- ul 5 ATTEMPT ATE IP WAS VAS rADE to or or improper Influence we will willi wi i agree with wih you ou The Tribunes Tribune's callS clIng call l cl- cl t S Ing two members of oC th the court Into q conference conference apprising them In advance ance I of oC publication what that papers paper's at at- at S. S I at-I e would be in be In the case and b by inference saying N to to them Govern yourselves accordingly that paper and Its Is management has committed commUted is an unpardonable offense It I is not a ai f i sufficient excuse to f say ay that no harm was done All Al the harm harl possible was done The bullying g editor of a bullyIng bullying bully bully- buli buly- buly Ing paper summoned t two vo judges of or tho the Supreme court and discussed with them matters relating rel to a n pending I ce case It I was was' an outrage upon the theT T people of the state a repetition of a in that thal office in inS invasion In- In 5 habit not new an j. j S f ta Ji of the purity of or the bench by bya byc b c 1 a journal which notoriously halts hals at atS S nothing to secure Its Is ends uP Wo We 0 are arc surprised that tJ at the justices could uld have havo been inveigled into the t i conference an and hope that never nevet gain again in In the the thc slate state can canS L- L nir Justice permit himself to be made madey S y I if r Ni arty party to so offensive an Incident Iut ut we ive do not believe beleve tlC the judges S h j S leel a to be e forced forcel Their offense offenseS S i was vas nit nW in deciding tho the case but In O discussing g an Incident In connection with wih th thy case 1 |