Show SAYS NO JUSTICE IN DURAND COURT GOURT Declares Attorney of Collection Agency Prepares All Docket Entries EXTORTION IS CHARGED Latest Complainant Against 4 t Murray Iu of or Peace leace Stakes Strong St Statements That the court of C. C 1 F. F Durand Justice Jus jus- tice tico of oC the peace hence of or Murray and Its proceedings proceeding's an and amid Judgments and orders are a n con conspiracy pure and simple to harass annoy and extort money from Crom unfortunate debtors for the time use and benefit of Francis G. G Luke Is among the allegations against that concern contained In a n petition for Cor a writ of prohibition by C C. W. W Miles filed yesterday yesterday yes yes- es and amil directed against Durand The rime filing of oC Durand cases Is be becoming becoming be- be coming of oC almost almo t dally daily occurrence Hardly a day passes that some complaint complaint com corn plaint Is not flied filed against the time Murray court or a 0 writ of prohibition a asked to restrain It H from rein proceeding in sonic some of Its Us alleg alleged d illegal acts The tenor of them all is much along the th- lines of or Mr Miles Miles' complaint which Is In substance That on or before beCore March 25 1906 was commenced on omm behalf of oC tho the Palace market before C C. F. F Durand Durand Du Du- rand against the time plaintiff to recover 31 07 On or about April 6 6 avers the petitioner appeared an and amid filed flied an affidavit for or change chango of oC venue cnut as ns provided provide by the time statutes the same lm laving having been filed before the time time set for Cor an appearance or answer by the time defendant efen and by the time filing thIng of the affidavit the petitioner alleges the time justice justice jus jus- tice lice lost all jurls Jurisdiction in the time case Holds HollIs Judgment Void oitI The rhe petitioner further alleges thai that the Justice justIc overruled the affidavit an and andel andset set Ret el It aside Afterwards about Ma May 29 1906 the time said Durand rendered a I certain pretended Judgment in favor o I of ot the plaintiff In Iii the time action fiction am mint against the defendant for the lie sum ol of f and costs The petitioner holds that the time Judgment ment is IJ void and I If P In n excess ss of oC the Jurisdiction of or Du Du- Du rand Miles states further that lint Durand If P about to I Issue ue an nn execution against him on tIme the pretended judgment anc has lias ordered him to appear II Ir Irlis his lis court on July 2 25 to answer ques ques- Ions concerning his property that the Justice further threatens atens to fine and petitioner for COl em contempt If IC lm he lu neglects or dl disobeys obes obe's the order while on the time other othe- hand Mr It Miles lIles contends If f he obe obeys s 's and tho time said MId Investigation discloses no property properly belonging to him hen he will iiIi be subject to further an- an nOl of r a similar nature OB as Durand threatens to and will I Issue sue other and further orders orden of tIme the same Fame tenor nn anc purport all nil and solely for the purpose of or annoying and harassing the peti pelt t I oner M Mr H. H i ii I. x u ulli amid 1 that Durand Knows no 11 that mat hoMs hui un und anti 1 was was' wasat at all times without any ammy jurisdiction In the action since the time filing or of th time the affidavit mentioned anti and that Durand wilfully knowingly and with knowledge c and malice aforethought violated tho time provisions pro of I the law for forthe forthe or orthe the express and malign t purpose of harassing and damaging g the time petitioner peti loner and amid has so anti and harassed har- har assed him In the time sum sum o 0 of 25 5 U Mr Miles then follow with the following fol fol- I lowing statement I Says Sap Its It's Not a Court And your upon ullon further Information an and amid belle belief urther allege t that lint sal said preten pretended court at al Murray Is In truth an In fact not a D acourt court of justice or a purt urt at all but butIs butIs buts Is s a part and anti ail It the lie Franc Fennel G. G 3 Lul Luke e collecting c ag-c agey antI and that lint one on- Kane a lawyer lawer fol the collecting agency Ie is in fact the f rk for Cor or the time said justice court an and amid jU Juste Juse e and amid preparo nil ill docket entries ai al all dictates all of the proceedings of or t tr tl court and thai that the lie whole of the tho pr y ded court and Its ts pretended anti and orders are a conspiracy II ia and simple to harass anno annoy and tort monc money law lau lawor lawor or no tie law justice no Justice from Crom unfortunate for debtor the tho use mill arid benefit of oC the Fran G. G Luke Lulo collection collee- collee lion tion agency called f Merchants Merchants' Protective Pro Pro- ns association Th The Timo petitioner f s for fOI a writ of prohibition to sto the justice lice from proceeding anti and punitive e damage darn dam age In In the sum I CiO Judge G G. G G. strong Issued a writ returnable ore Judge C. C W l Morse e on Aug 1 |