Show IN I W TESTIFIES Hec Declares Ic the he Lent Money Jonc it to n Holt Bolt Hol Which WI Wasn't tt Returned The final testimony in ill the case o of Pearl May Holt Bolt against G G. T. T Holt was waN concluded yesterday and amid morning the tho ar arguments wore olo concluded In th the att af at- t The ca case e was submitted to Judge Morse who who has has taken the time mat flint ten ter under ad Mrs its hs Dunlop mother mothel o of Mrs Holt Hol was vas as the principal witness winess in the case casc testifying for Cor Mrs Is Hol Holt Bolt Mrs Mis Irs Dunlop testified that 4 lent the tho ho young oung couple cou ecu pl pie money to start t m housekeeping also that she sue l lent nt Mr lr lieU Holt loll 5 with wih which to get the lie wedding invitations In which she she claimed had hial never ne cl been re repaid re- re I paid She he denied that lint she had ever evem I er e Interfered with wih the young young couple and Ind that tho time inference of too much mother law wa was untrue Site Sho stated slated thai limit shin sho saw unIt Holt slap ship lila hrs wife site once ah ala often ofen him him hll curse anti and swear ear s ear s at al her Mr 11 Hol Holt al also o went vent on tutu 11 time the stand and testified that lint Mr tt ald 1 Holt II had hail not re re- re turned tinned to her hier lh the hue personal l belongings the time court had hai ordered hi him urn to return a week ago hut but that he hc had retained o of value Holt Hol testified In ni his own o n behalf sayIng saying say say- ty- ty Ing that the goods had lint been sold Jold b by him before the suit was was filed led He lie still loved loed his hits wl wife ho he 10 declared and al sti had often asked lien her to come back and live livi him hll but she had refused The flue contention of Mr Mi- I Holts Bolts 1 ney Y In atorY ator- ator contesting the time plea for or separate sep sep- arate aate maintenance the basis of tho ho suit Was vas as that by Mrs Holts Holt's condon- condon lir tile the he acts of oC her hel husha husband d sho she had no tie pl plea a at bar for fot protection that while the law Jaw protected and aided where danger or Ot malice malco was shown In the tile present ent ca case t. t tho lie condonation had hail had hul tho lie effect of debarring her hem from the tho relief asked for |