| Show JUNK MAN ASKS fOR I III SATISFACTION Sues Charles Crane for fOI for Dogs Dog's Bite and Other Injury WAS VIAS J ATTACKED BY THREE Ahl Alleges Alleges' IJ es Further lie le Was n zis A When He lie le Returned to 0 Look for fot E Alc Alleging that lint he he was attacked cl by hy tin ee dogs belonging to tho time defendant and that he lie was bitten on both arms arias and hi Ins his left lef leg M. M Isenberg filed fed suit sull against Charles Crane In the thc Third district dis dl- dis- dis court COUt asking for fOl damages The complaint states that tho the plaintiff plain plain- tiff miff If Is In iii the business of or bUln buying and selling Junk On Friday June S S. S 1906 ho he hr alleges when whon ho entered Mr Cranes Crane's premises at East Kast South Temple street he lie was attacked by three dogs logs which he hc complains were allowed to run free and In Iii attempting to get away from the dogs he he further complains he lie tripped tripped and fell foi Oil n a wire wirO stretched along the wal walk whereupon the dogs caught him and bit hit him Ho asks ask thousand 5 a n lar lars lams for fot the bite bile bie For a second cause of action acton the lie plaintiff alleges that thal the next day he lie called at the of oC the caled plaintiff for the pUpo purpose e of learning his name with a view to bringing action against t him hini While asking members of or the defendants defendant's family for fot Information he alleges he was again attacked by a atlo dog and further that hunt the thc defendant him a violent blow In the face with wih his fist breaking his hits glasses and causing them to cut a deep gash Jash In his cheek cheel He lie was rendered unconscious unconscious uncoil uncoil- from the blow he complains and an remained so 80 for tom tomten ten minutes He lie was confined to hl hula his bed lied for fot three days by reason of the tile assault he lie alc alleges es and all for two wee weeks Its was unable to at attend attend attend at- at tend to his lila business He lie le therefore asks s damages on the second cau cause e. e. e |