Show e HE LO I H COURT Ci ClfO Cao o Not Pro fn ii liy hy of E Evidence The Time Supreme court handed down a decision yesterday in the tue ca case e of or the John J company f respondent against 0 O. D D. I appellant r reversing the time decision of the tIme Second List District net con court COlt rt which Ion found rid for CUI t the lie plaintiff ami anI a new trial was ordered ll Th Tire The action acton isas to tu recover er 5 alleged to be Le due on omi a contrad contract con- con tract trad for foJ goods good sold old anti and delivered Tine The Tie appeal was based on the time tact fact that thai the tl lower com COUt I In charging time Hie Jury said that the lie tw should l establish his hiis case b by a preponderance of the time l e tience In II the allegations of ur his com cent COI- COI plaint plaint The flu Supreme court decision It holds o that the time burden was upon the plaintiff to prove IHU the allegations of oC his complaint b by a preponderance of the evidence which was ivas not dune in this case cage a and amid ld hence reverses IC the he lower court und arid ald orders a new mien trial trial |