| Show ANSWERS SUIT TO REFORM CONTRACT Griffin Grifin Company Declares That Agre Agreement ment Was Made With WithFul Full Ful Knowledge Asserting that no fraud was intended intend Intend- nd- nd ed eti and that the contract entered into by tile tte tWo vo 1 0 companies was well weB understood understood under under- stood when the names were cere tio tile II I Ix 1 I. I Griffin company compan filed an anan an answer r to the thin s suit lt of or V. V v. v M. M 11 Rash Hash and the tho Rash I Fruit company compau yes yes- terla The Tho suit sui was originally filed Cled for the tho tio purpose of or changing changIng the word word- lug ing 11 of or a n compact entered Into between tho the two to concerns January 2 28 S 1908 whereby the Griffin Grifin compan company purchased pur pun chased the stock an and business of or tho ho Idaho al o P Produce company from rom rein the nash concern concen for tor with wih the added stipulation that tho the Rash Kash- Ho Roylance company compan was not to do an any moro business in Bannock county Idaho tho the seat seal of tho the Idano Idaho company compan It T was contended later in a n suit suS filed 1 by the Griffin company that tho the Rash- Rash com company pan WI was violating the contract entered into and ani on their showing an all injunction nut wa was entered against the tho local concern In the thu district dis dis- court of oC Bannock county Idaho during th the summer The he count Rash Ro Roy Rash lance lauco company started cult nult In tho the dIstrict dietrict district dis die court ourt in hi Salt Sal L Lako Ito on October 2 to havo have t the thu original compact amended so o that the they could do business through aK agents in pocatello and Bannock coun- coun ty The Griffin company lakes tho stan stand that all al understood that that tho the Rash RUHh company wits was WIS to keep out of th tho field as ono one of the In the transaction and asks aska that tho the original contract n remain maln unchanged |