Show o. o 4 04 H M M t c O Ot t p. 4 COURT J JIU RING VI IU G t 4 OF OP NIGHT I I GO GOWN oN 4 l Chicago Aug C G. Ruling that thata 4 4 f a night gown is not IlOt a I I. I l ce necessity s 4 Judge lur Harry IS if Tuthill of or the tile Laporte La- La f 4 ff f 4 porte county count Superior court Is- Is 4 f 4 sued a a restraining order orden olter at al Mich- Mich f 4 ft i today tOllay 18 is- 1 f 4 ff t tIgan Igan nn City I forbidding 4 f y old yar-old old ar-old Mary li to tu in- in f dul c In t the o extravagance nc m no and an neither did her hem palt 4 She s been beci associating with wih nifty 4 f people that's the tine trouble with wih f lId her rile Tho first thing tIling we know t 4 she be ue buying an all automobile f After fr hearing all al the tile facts acts in 4 4 the tIle case Judge Tuthill ruthl delivered f 4 his opinion In Iii II these words words- 4 f 4 A nightgown u. u n i is a comfortable le f ff f 4 convenient and desirable luxury 44 4 f 4 he lIe said but hut it is undoubtedly f I- I not hot a u necessity particularly In f this torrid weather r. r The Time only 4 f possible uso ue of or a a nightgown own Is to toI f I- I keep off cIT oI flies files fles and aid mosquitoes and f ff f- f I the bedclothes will trill wi do just as f well Therefore I forbid this this 4 44 4 Hure 4 44 contemplated contemplate expenditure 4 44 4 O 44 4 M 4 M M M 4 4 O |