Show r NOT YEH ERY FAIR PAIn BUSINESS i I I If there Is an any mystery more puzzling than titan the J identity of or the bank robber it Jt is is tho treatment of ot ott t the case casc by the Herald and the Tribune Until 1 recently the Tribune has las had a monopoly of or sian- sian derous crous Innuendo but ut on on Thurs Thursday a tho the Herald 11 dipped gracefully Into the tho muck pot and printed l. l tho the following in In Inthe the course of or a rather free tree oom- oom h on the case t Manifestly it Is the play to put Nelson through f the sw sweat at In order to bring out all he knows about the robbe robbery and then hand it to the four others others- maybe who five who are said to bo be the tho foundation stones atones of or the robbe robbery Up to this time there apparently has been nothIng noth- noth Ing disclosed 1 that would indicate the whereabouts of or the stolen mone money It is a matter of or general comment however er that two persons persona who have haveL L i been eli prominently mentioned In connection with t the affair have havo now larger lars bank accounts b by tar for forthan than their reasonable profits and Income might S. S warrant arrant them In having Of or cour course courte e that Isn't as bad as it can be The Herald 1 always Is ladylike lIke enough to lag somewhat behl behind ll the Tribune In the Ufe matter of impropriety os the following from lom the tile Kearns paper of that date 7 will m show t If It the public had all ll the facts all the tho lies all Cn kc- kc j. j tho the tricks that make up the record of or that most remarkable thero there would bo be no doubt S left lett In the mind 1 of any man that not only was the theSS S-S S 1 crime planned by others than A. A W. W Nelson but r. r S that a n. number of or prominent men In and out of ot the I church had planned panned and d to prevent the punishment o of the guilty man It 11 Is Js fairly Irl clear to most persons persons that the federal federal fed fed- e S I eral grand jUl Jury ha had a better opportunity to get at attile atS t. t S tile facts in tho the bank case than an any one else In S town has Those men muon worked for tor weeks creeks trying trying- I and tr trying hard to hard to solve the riddle They finally returned an Indictment charging a l man with the crime Mabe a be th they have ha the right man and maybe maybo S they But at least tho the men who returned S this indictment should know as much as an any one else does oes And we believe the members of or that S grand ral d ju Jury are are fully as 10 honest and quite as as fearless fearless fear- fear I less as either the Herald 1 or 01 tho the Tribune There There- Therefore fore tore It is a fair fall assumption that what has been beenS 1 S done Is the best th that t could be done I 1 Now o if Ir there there- are arc four or five others p In the crime it II would woul bo be o proper propel for the Hert Her Her- t al aid to tell who the they are alC They should have been j Indicted too too and and quite certainly would have havo been It if evidence 0 to cause causo a belief In their guilt had hall been presented before the grand rand jur Jury S 1 I If there Js I evidence to warrant the statement that that three or four other men men plainly plainly indicated indicated- r S are guilty that evidence c should 1 have been een CommuS communicated S 'S 1 S P t S to the grand Jury juo before it a adjourned And If there thero is not enough evidence to warrant the theS t S open publication of ot the time names there Is not evidence 7 h to 10 warrant this implication of ot lax and Ineffective Ineffective In- In I effective work by the grand rand jury l' l c And touching the tho Tribunes Tribune's vapid dream copied cople S a above e What Is the good of or saying If the public pub pub S lic Bc had all tho the facts facts and and 1 all that sort or rot S What are all tho tIme facts Who ho Is the better bellel ot off than the public Is the Tribune in possession of or an facts If It so so it Jt should 1 give gl them then to the public That Is Its bounden duty It failed to the give any anyS S facts to to the time grand Jury juz evidently c for tor tho thu men ir tf hist it It Has be been P working ln ver were not In InS In- In S S S Anybody Iy od can n go up town and Via wag the head headS S und cry out If If you knew all tho the facts But Dut ButIn S r In a case of or such Importance as af this where the tIme y f. f names as well us the fortunes of or mud men are at t stake take 5 that sort of malevolence male o should be left let for fOl the children in pla playhouses hou es and thc the gossips about the f ItO o In a a. country store at midwinter when there S Is 1 nothing to think about un and 1 no one to think These papers talk a as If they tho- knew something S If thc they did th they would print it That thc they dont don't print It Is proof that the they dont don't know They act like a tot lot totor of or children young oung and and not ve very wen well bred They hc should have the manhood to do one of two timings things S Either malo make their charges openly I or accept the situation Innuendo will get nothing I S Slander will wUl not convict Coining of ot rumors will not 5 t S C evidence I jj jf- jf Time The grand Jury has tried to unravel the case This hie Indictment Is the grand s 's solution Those men enS are aro as honest as ns any one in the office of or any p paper p r in in Salt Lake Lale An And 1 the they w wore sere re hett better r equipped to get to-get get et evidence Where here they failed does doea It seem prop proper r for these Irresponsible to pretend to better knowledge go And does doS it look well wen for them to pretend to a knowledge which If Ie the they had la 1 they should have ave shared with the grand Jury 5 If It The Republican knew an any further facts In Inthe Inthe inthe the case those facts would be published without del delay a If It we get any we shall print them But S until we yo do we shall continue giving l the other I i S morning papers an example of propriety In Journalism journalism Jour jour- by refraining retraining from flom asserting where we rc can cannot cannot cannot not prove |