Show TWO VO t SUEt SUED i K Colt SL It I lias Coining hack According to the thc way the Utah Gas Gast t Coke company reads its contract 3 J. J D. D and John Ritchie flitchie who vho a as Hanley t Ritchie the gas i as mains of the new company that hOt irm owes the company with Interest front from the first of this month fhe gas people are arc suing the con con- and the Utah Savings Trust company their surely for that amount The file complaint recites the terms onus of lie tue contract between the tho gas company and ind Hanley Ritchie and goes on to relate elate that to secure the permit to lay mains nains under macadam or paving it gave a bond to the lie board Of public works In the sum of and also ept on oil deposit in a bank 2000 to cover the expense 01 of relaying pave pave- that tIme the contractors might go ahead with the the- work I Front From May IS 18 1906 to February LI 1 1907 1007 It says approximately 50 51 miles of pavements wore velo laid by the for the company and thou then a supplemental contract was entered into covering 20 miles more The contractors claims the company were lo to pay in Iii each Case for fui the resurfacing log ing of the streets From February 21 lo to August ai the gas people say tay they spent 1 for Hanley Richie to tile Hie city anti and they sue for tho he hal bal due on this nearly |