Show Is III un ASPHALTUM BED BEDIS BEDIs IS to LODE DE CLAIM General Land Office Upholds Local Office Rulings in Mineral Case In n. n de decision delon lon that t reached tho the city yesterday t from the general land lanti office the tho decision of the local land office holding that Milo lIJo Clark Clad had properly located an tn deposit In itt Utah Ulah county count as a n. lode lodo claim was affirmed The Tue case se has been watched with no lit little tie local interest ns as tho tue deposit formed a few tow years n ago ngo o tho the subject matter of or a I Isale sale tale from front Clark to the elt city of tf Salt Snit The title Litle of tho case casO Is D. D C C. protestant and anti placer pIncer claimant versus Milo Clark anti and lode loe claimant claim claim- n ant nt A decision was rendered on Xo- Xo November v emb vember r 22 22 1006 from which tho appeal was waR taken It W was S claimed h by Holcomb who had tho the land hand In question up as a 3 placer claim that lint a n. lode JOllo location would not hold for t ti tt deposit of phal- phal tuni The local office found That the tho deposit consisted of or saml- saml 5 1 and limestone Impregnated ted with n oil that there extended d through h the claims a vein eoln of asphaltum nf or I to 8 S foot feet In thickness ICO LO feet nn long Ions und 70 0 feet In depth that the n ns- ns rock was found round In place beIs berWIn be- be iw Is I cn fl walls and had tho the general genera characteristics char char- of a t vein In having havin lip dip strike and course The Tho 1 decision was made made- that the till claim had been heen properly located 11 as fiR a 11 lode JodI do claim tinder r the tho mineral laws otI of ot I Ih I l I S |