Show m WALKER VALKER DEFENSE MAKES STATEMENT Hopes for Freedom Based on I Justifiable Homicide Statute 4 I ATTORNEYS PRESENT CASE 4 II Inferred fel Charges of Perjured Evidence Made by Both S. S Sd Sides I eSI Republican Special Service e W Ogden Ogden Doc Doe 19 Frederick Walker stands before his jud Judges es claiming no advantage excepting those guaranteed him by y the th justified homicide statutes of the state This in substance was the statement mado by one of his counsel counsel coun coun- maro sd sel torne Attorney A. A G. G Horn in his openIng opening open open- ing lag argument for tor or the tho defense defens in the te trial this afternoon Only tomorrow remains before the tho fate of or Walker charged with the murcer murder mur mur- te S. S der det of Dr Earl Larl S. S B Beers ers will wi be In the hands hanthi of or the jury jun anti and the de defendant fondant should know his fato fate before the end of the week wee Much speculation has hns been indulged in as ns to the verdict that will wi he be ren ren- te dered Tho possible po verdicts are arC Guilty Guity Cull Guil Gui Gui- ty or murder In the second degree deree al althou although although al- al thou though h these are arc regarded ed as a highly Improbable voluntary manslaughter or S Involuntary Io manslaughter and not guilty guit or a disagreement ment A general generalS S opinion prevails that it will bo ho one of ot wi the latter laUr or Ot Involuntary manslaughter manslaughter Jur Jury Visits Arguments in the case did not begin until 11 1 o'clock today todar Tho The delay dela was occasioned by the fact that the court granted a 3 Joint motion moton by which the thel l jury was permitted to r review view the premises where the fatal struggle took cr place f Attorney torno Samuel T. T Corn Cor then opened for the state In the course of or hisS his S ar argument he held without qualification v- v that the testimony of o Mrs Irs Donohue was manufactured and that he rl did not notel el believe belleve ve It it Tho ho tale was vas very affecting he hA h said aid but he hc was forced to doubt Its veracity He scouted the Idea that alker begged beed Beers not to ruin rin the to human hu of hl his wife as aR It I was contrary nina man nature and averred a that lie ho dl dh not believe o that Beers brazenly am an vilely vUel confessed his Intimacy with Sirs Mrs Irs Walker Rather did 1111 ho lie hold to th thi the hele belief that Beers Heer feared eared the Interview with wih Walker alker and cited portions of ot th the evidence In support of his contention Attorney Corn claimed that the physical phy ph- facts contradicted L Lawrence wrence He raid suld Id that Lawrence Lwrence had t testified that the llio men were evenly matched an and yet after the fight t Walker wal walked 1 out of ot the store tore and the said s d there thero were wen no marks on his face tace ace He didn't even c need a clean shirt said the at at- at Attorney At Attorney At- At torno torney Exhibiting Exhibiting- Boors's shirt torney tOIne C Corn rn thundered Earl Carl orl S. S Beers needed a clean shirt I tin do not ii l to 0 say fy or r tb do ani except to 0 carry om j g crIes 1 to en in inh h hut but you yon the tho to La b execute c 1 this thin 7 r man t In Clio tho j pIcco aco von OU ou I 5 I s b 1 hearty heart t r of ot tt lUu UIn B 8 part tor of ot S the dl tty wait wui In there 57 This man wa tempted tere sent for He lie HeaR said ld th the counsel He lie was Bent f r V was aR bt n until lila his skull n was broken He lie was wa va beaten until two two days later he d died Attorney i Corn then comment l on the te candor and honesty of l the Iho Hulls Hun and asked the Jury to rr r a conF conscientious con con- I. I F verdict ir lct on the la law and evl- evl dence enee Ho lie le spoke for an hour and 5 three three-qu q three Pica for 4 Attorney A. A Q G. Horn madl his opening opening open open- ing plea plen for 01 A the defense during the afternoon He lie m made lle a forcible address S 5 In t of a n ba bad cold He le began by telling the tho Jury that ho he would not nt wave 1 the tho bloody blood shirt before them theta to preS prejudice pre pre- pre pre- f judice or Influence them le IIo He stated f f tt S that ho was opposed to the employ employ- counsel when whet there ere are arc f f ment of private 4 and In Intimated In- In prosecutors k competent public that they were Influenced b by f the jingle of the coin l The Walker family had bad suffered SL i enough from tho hc h Deers' Deers He lie was vas there hi he said Raid In a cause that was justified the tho people but butIn butin not only In the eyes oyes of or pe In n the eyes ees of the Almighty I I He stated that tho the question they probably would h have hO O the gre greatest test difficulty dif dif- in solving would be the cred cred- credibility cred- cred of testimony He lie le believed that 1 their b the HulLs ul w were ra discredited by own I testimony lq and that If tho state had hd not Ito tio testimony of ot tho the Hulls Huls they would have il no case at all al He thou then v commented on the discrepancies of theA the tho A Hulls Bulb both Sn in the preliminary hearing c and in the trial He averred that the Hulls wont to Nevada ada after the affair Hulf stated that Mrs Mis Hull had not only and Hul t S S testified falsely but hud had suppressed evidence Not only that but the mornIng mornIng morn- morn 4 Ing after she Not l left fl the stand her guilty guity conscience hurt her and she went to I th the court for tor protection for telling al a a. a different story Stol l I Counsel for tor tho state said the penitentiary peni pent yawned for tor Mrs Donohue He lIe lIeT le lery and asked face his aco it back bac in T ry flung i do Intended to t tho the state what th they r. r with Mrs Irs Hull He lie also lo commented lh f. f on the fact that Mr Mrs Hull Hul prompted f S 4 t f. f S her hen while daughter the daughter ugh with wih ter a n was nod on of the tho her ncr stand head bead hie f L. L I Never oer In th the history of ot a Utah court courtS trial into a j gone lm has a prosecution S much for u a conviction on so asked and md said Attorney testimony perjured L I Horn ibm pErjure Walker cr has ha been heen amply ami punS pun pun- S He stilt atH has a duty however wever and anti I appeal to u your manhood youry your love lovo for homo to send genel him back to his l' l y his liis little daughter The They and mother him badly ba Itlo Court then to tok tOJ k a ar need t until tomorrow morning s r recess c the opening of court tomorrow With morning Attorney W W. h II I. I j ur will make tile final Inal l JO pir-a pir Ie a 10 tO J jui y o maI defense derene and District Attorney for tor the w will follow him with wih hm George Georgo argument for the state state tho the closing Issued for Wibur Wilbur Wil Wi- I have havo been VI VII Subpoenas and Mrs Gertrude Hull Hul Hull bur r. r I Hul lr in the S llla Miss Edith Hull Hul as witnesses Lawrence cc case c against LaWI |