Show WIFE'S PARENTS ii i i SUPPORT HUSBAND Help Anton Nielson Get Divorce from Their Daughter II Flora I I I II SKIDOO NUMBER DIVORCE Matinee of Judge Ritchie Results Results Re Re- suits In Severance of Five Marital Ties Anton lIton oll lund hall his Ills wife's i nt on omm imis sio when he lie appeared before Judge M. M r. r I I. I h. h to u a default divorce orce case cuso n against Mrs Fl Flora Nielson William K U. Lazaro her father corroborated corroborate the thc testimony of his son son-in- law Nielson was WM one olle of 11 live ile who ho divorces A sixth bah case ens' was c con contested a n nol i tested rind and alt all the tIme evidence way was taken laken married life ilfe was waa brief orlet H It II that lint lie he Imd hind been living with lih th tim Lazaros Lazaro it mit lO East Casl Second South street and married Flora March Mumei 3 30 ieee 1100 June 1 of or Ihn timA your al ht hla hi wife vite he ime said loft him hum Sho She Is 18 still In III Salt Sait Lake but has never lIc returned to to tc her husband who ho Is la still stilt In with ImI hl- wife's parents Judge c Ritchie was wa in inclined in- in dIned to question further as to Mr Mr- 11 reasons ons for leaving nor homand homo hom and husband but bul XI llon attorney S UK grated that lint there theme were circumstance In tn inthe the tho case enst that did iid not nol appear In Iho tH ii suit Time The court Itself that lint the time was not nol on Iho time part of ot the tue husband un and then ceased questioning Lazaro tc testified that lint his daughter lm l left hei hel husband When hen asked to lo set lh time late date for the time desertion he lie said lie he had imad paid no particular attention to 10 It itI I Drew Unlucky Number Mr Mrs IrM Emmaline II H. Chi round found U i a a. skidoo oo number In Iii her imer wedded life liCe She Sue ha had imad marred James hi in Salt Lake Luke December r 3 2 j. j 1001 1101 He lie had hud deserted Oc her she sue said al March lIuch tin following year car Sho Simo was waa atS granted n a di divorce dl- dl vorce August u ud 23 1 1907 1917 and amid permitted to 10 resume her hoi maiden name of oC I Harper Ta rIer Mrs I 18 Esther her Peterson a oun ounh woman oman with hair hall almost a it Purim pun brown IJ secured a divorce oreo John A. A Peter Peter- son together with l I lu a month alimony for fOI herself and their year ol l ehll child She Sime alleged that her hus husband n hadon hat had tier her Ue on various Ious occasions called and amid had haLl knocked her hem down They Im har imad l I been married at Ogden den In August 1 and had hind separated separate some sonic time ago In imm Sail Sali Lake When hell her husband came caIne to tJ s their child ehUd she sue sail said at her imer home V. V West cst Second South street streel tho they had hall quam- quam and amid he lie had imad struck he her with hl lit hh lI lists lS knocking her hel down Tier Her husband she sue t testified is earning from Crom 80 to lo 10 lOt lOta a n month antI and was willing to 10 pa pay whai hj 1 was as right In iii the wa itay ay of supporting the b child Kicked a II 1 lcm 1 Mrs II Peterson gave c a her evidence In iii o a I quiet S l enough h manner but IUt ut her hel witness Mrs Clark appeared In iii tears She Sue wan waa wa- wa a n neighbor of the time Petersons and amid ha had seer seem time the husband husban kick lilek a u door oot down to lo gala gait ah admittance once Mrs Irs who lives hives 01 em last Jast Third South street secured a dl l from James who ha un her in lii January Januar of or last year She Sime said she hc does not know where ho Ime Is Mrs 1113 Anna D. D Reynolds was a awarded etl a tl decree ll by default from Walter Waiter tHel ne Reynolds fey Rey Holds whom she charged with tumid and support non Thc They were en married June Junc Iii 15 DOl I. I None of time the foregoing oln case cases occupied any ammy great cat length of lime hue bul when tim Ih the case of or Albert ibert If n. Rogers against ag Mr Mrs r l. l Luc Lucy Rogers had hall proceeded for fOI som time lime the time judge called a unit hull The Time casenas case caso was us contested and Od Rogers was examined aa au a witness with considerable care cure Judge gc Ritchie said al his hiM time lime was wa- limited and objected to lo the timo bringing of such sueh a ah h N nth ca case before him on oil default Cault divorce dlvore day nr Attorneys for Cor both sides to lo do their best to have It over in 20 minutes more moie and the time I C evidence was vas almost al al- al mot most all cli in h by that lime The effort wa wn unavailing however for the time judge c required re rc- re- re more evidence c In iii regard to property property prop plOp erty 11 which was os In lii dispute and amid time the case was continued until unlit Saturday Ila morning Too ruC Many It 11 is Es n a case casc of or ton too man many step with the lie Timings Things s ha hid come to such a pa pass S s that the time wife refuted refused to eat cat at uL time the same table as IS time the hu husbands husband's Jand's cM hn en und mud time the chief cau cause e of or complaint that hunt the time hu husband had hs ims wife was that she was I continually leaving her home to I visit lt her married daughters She told me Of sal said Rogers nog that hint t she I rated more immure for lor or her children than she slit shedid dl did for me mc no c complaint was a 11 CI veil lengthy one umie but time the judge ruled much of or it tt out of or the time c case sc n It huIl he de- de cured dured that thai man many things therein r recounted recounted re re- counted had imad afterwards been condoned Evidence F. was deduced 10 show I that at the husband and wife divided the time bell bedclothes clothes with tho tue result that one omme night Mr Ir Roger Roger- had hind to another bed bcd Ills His wife had taken alcoa off of the Iho lIe bedclothes that belonged to her leaving him him with only a u thin quilt L Wife Vif at t I Ihn lie He said suld his hla wife Jau laughed hc at him he tried to lo get gel up one time JYll when n he lie wa WR sick with v lumbago o. o I A store an and dwelling ut at lie IHO South I First Weil ct street arc n n II hr I suit an and evidence was put pUl on omm as to lo tn tin tin- of this property no Rogers says sas imis hll wife has much pro prop t In iii h her r own name flume The defense o contests this find and the time Judge c said lie would not decide the time case un until ta tahe he lie hat had heard evidence e on timid this point I It ii Is Ig a clone question said f time Iho court whether r part parly to 10 tho tIme action Is entitled to a divorce They had hat been divorced u before but hut Mr Mrs Rogers Ho came caine t tack hack when the time husband promised to scud hl his imis children to lo Denver Deu He lIe did so 80 but afterwards wi waz comp compelled cither chimer her to tu rill bring them beam Jack buck or Jon vu them desolate I 1 suppose you rou have brought those these things for lor me to luke lake care of or vim wai Mrs Ir assertion says ft'S her hu husband when the time boys 1108 ret returned d. d |