Show COLORADO FIRM DY BY COURT Supreme Bench Hands Down Decision Criticising In Investment Investment Investment In- In vestment Company TRIED TO BUY A HOMEI HOME I But A A. F F. Christensen Paid More In Than He Ever Could Get Out Sonic Some stinging slinging criticism for fOI the contracts contracts contracts con con- tracts into Inlo which It had entered with would would-be homo home buyers buyer and a slight lI ht chan change e In accounting of Interest Is all nil the Colorado Investment Loan company company com corn pany won by 13 h to the Supreme court tho the cn case e brought against l it by A. A F. F Christensen en Of the tho contracts which and man many like him had signed tho the decision handed down Friday b by Chief Justice McCarty and concurred in by ly Justices D. D N. N Straun and ind J. J E. E Frick says rays It requires no argument ar to show bat Liat a contract which imposes obliga- obliga long lions so sided one-sided and oppressive c as ns ashe ho the one under consideration is unconstitutional unconstitutional and ought not to be he up- up held 1011 In other places place tile the court criticise the contracts as harsh oppressive and unconscionable The Tho court practically practically upholds the lower court In lt ft judgment although It remands th the thc case with instructions in to change chan e its ih Judgment somewhat on account of the different results obtained by the Supreme Su Su- Supreme preme court Judges when hen they came to tackle the problem as to just how much Christensen ought to be he paid pale ChrIstensen holds the court has sti still coming corning to him bin together with wit interest at S 8 per cent from the time of or the accounting Christensen paid 1 S for or stock 1 In Inthe the tho com company pan and then after a series of negotiations secured a loan o 0 of 2000 on a mortgage Christensen t to pay 30 a c. month until the debt was wa paid he he called for or an accounting accounting account account- ing after having paid In 1448 he found that the company compan had placed only 68 to lo his credit on stock acCounting ac- ac accounting ac ac- counting the as Interest The court goes Into detail with tho the accounting showing Just how exorbitant exorbitant tant flint such a system was and ends with the decision that Christensen Christonsen is entItled entitled en en- titled to 7 1 30 GO more than Ihan the company compAny com corn pany allowed |