Show GALVESTON BILLS REMAIN ON TABLE S tsI S Attempt to Rush Action Acton in ReS Re'S Reviving Re Re- 0 Measures a S 'S Failure S 5 Some of those o who faid taid all they did lc S 1 i not nol ot think that thin tho Galveston Gal bills bis ha hind had SS- S S received a a fair fai tal deal lal at the thc hands of S S the hou house e and Intimated that par parlia parliamentary parla- parla tin tin- 5 S 5 mentar had not been heen folS followed fol fol- ul- ul S lowed In iii time the action o of the f assembly I S S In tabling tho the measure neasure at hurs Thursdays Thursday's u S S ion tried to rC resurrect the measures s sc f. f yesterday c and failed c John Crichlow i. i v moved a reconsideration o of the bills his mo cc and this action W wa WUi defeated by hy a vote r of or 23 3 to 21 21 Several Sc eral members changed S 1 t their votes before the result o of the thc 1 roll i rol call cal was waN announced Those c In W I I charge cc c c of tim tha Democratic attempt to lo toi I i pat pats these bills a asked pleaded I and at last lust organized a pally of or hubS lobby lob hub S 4 i j b by bitts U l la that thronged t the Ole corridors of or Y iY tho house in Iii an attempt to tu j rush ruh through the these c bills th hiR r I I. I Iho tho vote vole was taken several FI i t I member members gave helm opinion that lint th there herr could be lC a U. measure drafted that thai woul IT p pJ J v k provide for or more decent t a rC m 4 tt-i tt 1 of or the thc city of Salt Halt Lako but hut thud the Jt S v t. t n agreed that thai the tho present measure would woul IM J. J i f S not Hot nn fill the bl bill When hemm time the vote otc WasS wa Was wat S 1 I i. i taken many o of the members expressed 1 m 1 S themselves as satisfied wil th ihy result t Others s saul said that tile they would i-alho i 0 1 i S S have havo O IH the IhU matter mater rul fully el cu and 0 would favor ra further ills ills- S j l I. I said time they a elsI els- els S r cu lon of or these bills i 8 I J |