Show DEED WAS AS SIGNED TO REGAIN FEllO I Supreme Court Reverses Case On Account of Influence Shown I The court cUIl reversed lC t I hIi lie In- i lower loVet 10 1 court CoUlt Friday In iii an art opinion handed down in ill lie case caso of or Cora Corn Bird Bird- Kali rl an aim al insane person by her I guardian I Isaac Birdsall appellant against James E. E and anel Hulda The he action was was was' brought to cancel dood ledl Cora Birdsall Bird u ci conveyed by Hirl- Hirl sall suI lo 0 o the ito defendants In iii II the tho tl action allol rua fur fm- fura ru a consideration of 00 11 it I is il S hold hlll Inthe in Ill inthe the tilt complaint that undue u was brought t to lo boar beni ii upon 10 the plaintiff ha I i it I ft and anc she sho hl was Wi Influenced l lo to lISow sigil ISow he deed in iii i t to lo regain her standing tandil I. I in him the Lime church of oC Jesus Christ of nr Latter Latter- day clay In The Ilie deed was signed signell on 01 J Juno June 1 11 II 1 1 1901 90 I I The case cose cae was waN i tried b bt bl fore fuire J Judge c In lie Sixth district dis court and the Iho was waR declared valid The Tho plaintiffs appealed the lie ca cast castlo l to lo the lie Supreme court l' l Against ga Church im 1 Commit OIt Cl lol The Supreme coust In Us its Is says that hint from Crom the thc testimony of the thic witnesses s it i Is 15 shown that lint at the tile time Cora Cola Birdsall now Insane signed I nee the tho deed tiit Silt sho was ii il laid body oely and aI alln ailing In him II mind Sue Sho believed c I that her hll hail had conic come upon ii h hoi ci because sue slie had aIled l to lo comply with tIlt the tw decision of nC the till church hurch court In II regard re n ri- ri rUI gard I tu o th lie Iho ii disposition loll of If If th the lie involved The flit dood was signed the Iii lph opinion muon holds holds in iii url order to tl regal regain n lie hoi 11 fellowship in tho lie church and amid her hel mental melI men mel mel- I tal iii and amid Ull health The rhe opinion t that thai th the deed was n signed with t that thie nt t llio 1 c consideration nJ did Ild not hot enter Into the tho transaction It I holds further that hint the delivery of or the thc was wa not Ilot legal after aCc it had hail been hen signed a ear eal after afler tile the iced deed was signed I ned ni II was wa comI coin coin- I milled to tile the insane inanc asylum at LIt Pro C Provo It was the thc I testimony of her ph physician that her hem I hereditary anti anil hc Insanity mu I i was I that she was WiS suffering menially when sho Silt was Wa prevailed upon lo to sign the mc deed tie The opinion was ivas written n h by Justice Joseph E E. Fil k and concurred In imi b hi time the other othor members of tho the court Till The decision of ur tIle the lower com court I was us reversed re 10 mc versed r lt and It I was ordered to lo set ct aside tile the Judgment al and amid restore the tue lo tu her ilci rl rights lights hl and amid anc property Costs Cust were awarded c to lo the plaintiff |