Show CANYON ALSO IN TROUBLE 1 Col Wall Wal Brings Action Acton Against Town for Water Rights RESTRAINING ORDER ISSUED J SOS Says Was ns Used to lo I ISIC Destroy Dam ar juul mil Injure Hl HI I J 4 Colonel Enos A A. A ahi A Wall Val brought an ac ac- ac I Uon against the town of ln BIngham ham Canyon Canyon Can Can- yon Its ius trustees an and marshal in the third district court Thur Thursday a restrain restrain- ing tho defendants from Crom interfering with his us use of tho the water from Crom ruin toe the canyon creek with which he operates his mill mi and mining machin ery ry Damages In the sum um of OOOO was also as asked ked for p unlawfully constructing con con- dams darns upon his property properly an and diverting lv the tho water The restraining order was granted and the defendants WeI were e cie cited into court to siow cause and nd set up Ull their claims to the water vater The defendants in the case are Mayor Anton Christensen cn C. C C E. E Adderley Ad- Ad derley John Hocking jr A. A G. G Gab Gab- Gat- Gat nelson on James Motherwell John W. W Grant and Philip Raleigh Haleigh For FO ten years Cl the complaint states the Wall Mill which was formerly known as the tue Dewey Mill had been heen operated by the waters from Carr CalT Fork FOIk a branch of the tw BIngham creek Wall Vall al changed the position of the rail mill mi and also put in an additional darn dam am to divert tho the water In June Junc 1906 In violation of the therl rl rights of or the plaintiff and for the al alleged alleged al- al legeti purpose of oC hindering the plaintiff plain plain-I tilt tiff tl from operating his mill mi the defendants de de- de- de maliciously anti and by h force and arm ann ail with wih dynamite an and by y blasting and toro tore away tho the new dam con constructed b by Wall Wail al The he waters water 4 were diverted and the defendants have havo sinco that time trespassed upon the thc ground of the plaintiff The damage to the plaintiffs plaintiff's business is alleged to tobe be he on account of blowing out the dam lam and forcibly preventing pre tl the plaintiff from continuing his business The Carr creek runs through the plaintiffs plaintiff's plain plain- tiffs tiff's property and his rights to lo I its Is waters were established by ly his pr prod de- de fhe The order issued by the court cites cite tl the defendants into court to show cause caus and aid set et up their rights lights to the tho water wale It I also prevents pre them from with wih the water Involved and tn the tie dam tun built tul b by them to divert th the water Is also to to be to removed b by the dc de nn ts |