Show I In II ii District Court COlt The Tite damage suit sull of IC Sarah J. J lid lid- lel till nap nul a against Jos G. G and anil others was wa continued In lit II the lie le district court yesterday c afternoon until to to- to day The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for fol losses loss sustained m by y the lie lr overflowing o of oC an Irrigation ditch dich near he her I land Jand at al Hooper In iii I 1903 and 1904 1004 which It I Is alleged destroyed two seasons seasons' crops The damages s to them is estimated at OO Ju Judge go Howel denied lh the motion moton to strike c out 01 h by liy tho lie plaintiff In the action acton ac ac- tion Uon ton of William 13 D. Call Cal 1 vs Union Pa Pa- Pa chIle company The rho defense e claimed the lila plaintiff I If obtained I ned out employment 1111 under an assumed name lume This part of rut the tho answer It Is alleged was vas an ln attempt to 10 plead shan sham ha n. n and a moton motion wal lefts ivas made to strike out out |