Show rJ S T J 4 HASN'T 1 J fc t. t 1 I Company Sties Mio on I for fo of 5 Patent I Alleged for or the lie CI charge of i 1 nt tiled filed recently AV A A. L Y V ch ol ii developed dc yesterday wh when en l Smith company flied filed Clec suit S t him In Iii the tho district curL court wan wa a arrested ire ted last Thursday 6 c oil th complaint o of Raymond Haymond C. C Naylor S f S one nie of II the lie stockholder In the plaintiff r company in the enl action acton li it being f that he had taken dies for rol or a a. patent nt helon belonging ln to the company for 01 the purpose of or if disposing of or them At t that time was is-as released on LI honda bonds The hr sui filed fed yesterday eHler ar that thai the company was wal formed fur for I the he tl pur- pur f poo pOtO of ut lt exploiting a certain patent tim um- l foi forceps C. C for Sic I use pat pat- J by l the tite th defendant and amid which r formed fonnell the lit o of time the tw corp corporation The rh rh complaint tl ale alleges i cg that ii i t the h. h defend defendi i J alit l t 1 ha hits a uj or will VIll wH I try to tn dispose for f jf hll Interest In lii II the lie patent which I IJ l. iM Is fJ also nl o alleged he lie hns hOM never I C feriod t tn ii th time the CO company 1 PO I S a it restraining order l Is the defendant from enjoining niru belling mig t. t or II if f C tho the patent I also alsi title III In the Hie I lie Invention to 10 I Ao of of company I tf S Ih l I o C C. V. comp Morse e 1 K ucc a tempo tempo-I I ii 11 Ri 1 ry vilt wi I Saturday April 4 II i I |