OCR Text |
Show ALIAS Summons (under amended complaint.) LI AIM OAS liN THE DISTRloT COUKTOF 0 the First Judicial Histr.ct of the territory 01 0 tab, O tab coun y. ihe Anglo American Land.Mortgago &Ageucy Co,, Limited, of London, a corporation, plain-till, plain-till, vs. Thomas t. Larl and Harriett E. Earl, his wile. The Lombard Investment company, a corporation, and Milton 11. Whitney, Charles S. Fairchiid, Harry E Mooney, Saniord li. Ludd and Frank Hagermau, receivers oi The Liouiburd Investment. company, deleudants. The People of tue territory oi Utah send greeting tu Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl, his wife. The Lombard Investment company, com-pany, a corporation, and Milton 11, Whitney, Charles S. Fairchiid, Harry E. Mooney, ban-lord ban-lord B. Ladd and Frank Hagermau, receivers of The Lombard luyeatment company, defendants. de-fendants. You are hereby required to appear in an action ac-tion btougut against you by the auoye named plaintiff, in the district court ot the First Judicial Ju-dicial district of the territory of Utah, and to answer tue complaint lilcu tuersin, within ten days (exclusive ol the day ot service) alter the service on you ot this sumiaons if served within this county; or if surved out of this c uuty, but in this district, within twenty days; otherwise within forty days or judgment bv default will be taken against you, according to prayer of this complaint. The said action is broughc to obtain a decree of this court against the defendants herein for the sum of ail.Tu-.IU, with interest ut 13 per cent, per annum, iroin tbe 1st day of January, A. D, l&'Jd, until paid, and for $l6u.uu attorney fees, and for costs of suit. Plaintiff alleges that on the ith dav of March, lsyu, Thomas F. and Harriett E, Earl, hs wile, executed and delivered to The Lombard Investment company com-pany a certain bond in the sum of $l.Buu,iO, Witn B per cent, interest with annum, peris percent, alter maturity Tout two oi said coupons have not been paid and thut th-t same witn the principal has been declared due and payable, xnat ou March lilsi, ls'JU. tbo said Lombard Co. sold and assigned ihe.said note to plaintiff, who is now the lega holuer there-ol, there-ol, and did then and there guarantee tno payment pay-ment of the wiihiu note and principal witnin two years ironi said lust mentio. ed date. Thut the usual uecree may be made for the sale oi the said premises to pay said deot, inieiest, eosis unu attorney itcs, that the proceeds of saio may be applied in payment of the amount due plaintiff, and that said dei;ndanis and each of tnem and all persons claiming uuder them or either of them subsequent to the exe cution of said mortgage upon 6ui t premises, cither as purchasers, encumbrancers or otherwise, other-wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, cr equity of redemption in said premises and every par' thereof, and tnac tne eaid plaintiff may have judgment and execution execu-tion agaiubt the said deleudants Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl and The Ljmbard Investment company, lor any deficiency which may remain alter applying the proceeds pro-ceeds oi 6aie. For tuber particulars see copy of complaint on file. And you are hereby notified that if you fail to appear and answer the said complaint as above required, the said plaintiff will apply to the court for the relict therein demanded, and costs of suit. Witness the Hon. William II. King, judge. aud the seal of the Oistrict court of the First J udicial district in aud for It-EAL the territory of Utah; ttiis 15th day of March, in the year of ourLord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-live, J. W. Beasley, Clerk. By Geo. Havekcajh, .Deputy Clerk. James A. Williams, attorney for plaintiff. |