OCR Text |
Show FIRST DISTK1CT COURT. A Verdict Against Elmer B. Jones-Orders Jones-Orders Mda Today. The jury in the case of W. II. Smith vs National Bank of Commerce et al, retired with the case shortly 3fter 4 o'clock on Saturday evening. They were out three hours and returned with a vei diet of no cause of action against the defendant bank and $2,346 27 against the defendant Jones This as wiil be seen is allowing Elmer B. Jones 25 per cent, of the money collected in stead of 50 per cent as claimed by him and allowing nothing for his Nebraska trip or any other legal' work he may have done for Smith. There is some talk of the defense making a moiion to set the verdict aside and, failing in this, of making a motion for a new tiial. Time has been granted the inquirer to prepare a statement on a mo ion for a new trial of its case against Dr. Shoebridge. Time has also been granted Attorney Attor-ney J. W. N. Whitecotton for Frovo city to prepare a statement on a motion mo-tion for a new trbil in the mill race damage case of W, R Pike ya. Provo city. The case entitled George Luft vs. J. J. Snyder et al, has been dismissed at cost of plaintiff, Monday's orders. Jackson vs. Jackson; decree ordered modified in accordance with stipulations. stipula-tions. union National bank vs. George A. Dusenberrv; supplemental decree en-tere en-tere 1 in accordance with stipulations. Moulton vs. Moulton; time to prepare pre-pare amendments to bill of exceptions to May 5th. Spanish Fork Co od ts. Ilyrum Hales; motion to dismiss denied. Peoples Co-op vs. John Wileon et al; continued to May 7th. W. P. Nob e vs- Mount Pleasant Co op; report ot receive: liled and accepted. ac-cepted. W", H. Smith vs. National Bank of Commerce and E. B. Jones; thirty davs time allowed to prepare statement and bill of exceptions. J. 'B. Francis vs. A. Hatch & Co , order that judgment be entered in iavcr of plaintifl and against the defendant de-fendant lor costs and defendant given to and including May 2nd to file exceptions ex-ceptions to cost bill. In dissolution Lake Shore Irrigation compan ; demurrer sustained and plan, tiff givm leave to amend to and including in-cluding May 10th; Defendant George Horen given to May 8th to amend complaint com-plaint and answer. Spanish Fork Co op. vs. Alma Hales; motion to dismiss denied. Rock Canyon Irrigation company vs, James Bonnett et al was brought before be-fore the court for trial. This suit to asctrtr ' i whetheror not the defendant la entitled to any water from the irrigating irri-gating creek used by the plaintiff corporation. |